RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Ohio should be so lucky to have married couples as adorable as George Henry » GLAAD: Q&A with former 'ex-gay' activist Yvette Schneider: 'I’ve never met an 'ex-gay' man I thought was not still attracted to men' » Head of Virginia's anti-equality org: 'open season to discriminate against anyone who believes that children deserve a mom and a dad' » Force behind Virginia's marriage ban ably demonstrates animus behind it » NOM to show rest of world its impressive ability to exacerbate loss » Bryan Fischer: Marriage equality supporters are like baseball's legendarily winning team » On NC's Attorney General and the bipartisan hunt for a 'culture war' off ramp » Read: 4th Circuit strikes down Virginia marriage ban » GLAAD: Change is possible: Former 'ex-gay' activist Yvette Schneider 'celebrates the worthiness and equality of all people' » Man who stands in way of Texas equality works to stunt economic windfall as well  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/19/2013

Where in the World is Maggie Gallagher?

by Jeremy Hooper

201303191050-1You would think this would be her shining moment. Maggie Gallagher was talking about the so-called Defense Of Marriage Act (which she found too "timid") back when few other conservative writers cared to dedicate the time. During Prop 8's initial season, Maggie was the most visible face connected to the fight. And of course she is a co-founder of the National Organization For Marriage, the organization that pretty much controls the marriage fight for the other side.

But here, a week away from the Prop 8 and DOMA cases going before the high court and thus injecting the marriage movement with its highest profile yet, Maggie is completely M.I.A. The "protect marriage" movement's grande dame hasn't posted to her National Review blog since March 4, and she hasn't contributed to her eponymous website since March 9. There haven't been any major press mentions nor public appearances. She has done a college debate or two with professor John Corvino, but those are paid gigs that are more about paying a bill and promoting a book than they are about shaping public opinion. In terms of public opinion, Maggie's radio silence is deafening. With major developments from CPAC to Sen. Rob Portman to Hillary Clinton playing out all around her, Maggie has let news cycles pass by without so much as a peep. Peculiar, to say the least.

Maggie is also notably absent from the speaker roster that NOM has lined up for its upcoming marriage march. The organization has announced nineteen speakers, including most of the major NOM players. No Maggie, however. Sure, there's still time, but one would think that if you're NOM and you're trying to rally the diehards, you'd very quickly and loudly sign up the one person who is most responsible for the organization and who will surely go down in history as the overall movement's most public face. But no. As of now, seven days out, NOM is moving forward with a Maggie-less march.

I find this fascinating, frankly. This is someone who has been hyper-focused on this particular conversation every step of the way. Same-sex marriage is to Maggie what chlorophyll is to my desk plant: it both colors her public profile and sustains her professional existence. I'm finding it hard to see this silence as a choice without some reason attached.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails