RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/19/2013

Where in the World is Maggie Gallagher?

by Jeremy Hooper

201303191050-1You would think this would be her shining moment. Maggie Gallagher was talking about the so-called Defense Of Marriage Act (which she found too "timid") back when few other conservative writers cared to dedicate the time. During Prop 8's initial season, Maggie was the most visible face connected to the fight. And of course she is a co-founder of the National Organization For Marriage, the organization that pretty much controls the marriage fight for the other side.

But here, a week away from the Prop 8 and DOMA cases going before the high court and thus injecting the marriage movement with its highest profile yet, Maggie is completely M.I.A. The "protect marriage" movement's grande dame hasn't posted to her National Review blog since March 4, and she hasn't contributed to her eponymous website since March 9. There haven't been any major press mentions nor public appearances. She has done a college debate or two with professor John Corvino, but those are paid gigs that are more about paying a bill and promoting a book than they are about shaping public opinion. In terms of public opinion, Maggie's radio silence is deafening. With major developments from CPAC to Sen. Rob Portman to Hillary Clinton playing out all around her, Maggie has let news cycles pass by without so much as a peep. Peculiar, to say the least.

Maggie is also notably absent from the speaker roster that NOM has lined up for its upcoming marriage march. The organization has announced nineteen speakers, including most of the major NOM players. No Maggie, however. Sure, there's still time, but one would think that if you're NOM and you're trying to rally the diehards, you'd very quickly and loudly sign up the one person who is most responsible for the organization and who will surely go down in history as the overall movement's most public face. But no. As of now, seven days out, NOM is moving forward with a Maggie-less march.

I find this fascinating, frankly. This is someone who has been hyper-focused on this particular conversation every step of the way. Same-sex marriage is to Maggie what chlorophyll is to my desk plant: it both colors her public profile and sustains her professional existence. I'm finding it hard to see this silence as a choice without some reason attached.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails