RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/25/2013

He only tried to alter our most precious governing document so that it bans gay citizens. Why talk about it now?

by Jeremy Hooper

He had no problem using our families for political sport. But now, at a time when he absolutely could (and SHOULD!) address his legacy, former president George W. Bush refuses to address marriage equality and his aggressive, multi-year push to ban it on a federal level:

Screen Shot 2013-04-25 At 8.53.38 Am-1


George W. Bush Refuses To Weigh In On Gay Marriage [HuffPo]


Not going to talk about, President Bush? Fine. So we will. I will. Always and loudly.

You inflicted untold pain onto millions psyches. Not just human psyches but our national psyche as well. You, in order to score political points, took gay people's rights and overall peace of mind and used those for your own cynical, Rovian-driven (and Mehlman-driven—ugh!) gain. At a time when this debate was growing and an able leader could have talked about respect for the millions of LGBT taxpayers who populate this nation, you chose, at this particular "decision point," to foster great division and stinging hostilities. You chose to make life harder for countless many human beings, the struggle longer for a minority civil rights movement, and the nation weaker at a time when we so desperately needed to find a way—some way, any way—to come together and tackle actual problems. That's on you, sweetie.

I literally remember where I was when I saw the Bush press conference calling for the Federal Marriage Amendment. That image and the pain attached to it will likely last until my final day here on earth—it was that indelibly hurtful. Now here, at a time when we are winning despite his considerable attempts to stop us, I will not let the former president shirk responsibly for the truly dark time in American civil rights history that he fostered. This large-looming aspect of his legacy doesn't just deserve mention—it deserves an entire wing in the very presidential library that some folks are now falling over themselves to laud.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails