RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/19/2013

Must you misrepresent everything, FRC?

by Jeremy Hooper

There are lots of ridiculous aspects to the Family Research Council's latest video attacking the idea of inclusive scouting. But for now, let's focus on one visual element, which is kind of poetic when you consider this organization's overreaches, general lack of respect for court procedure, reliably bad protocol, and overall egocentrism.

First the image. In its video, FRC pretends this photo is of Boy Scout officials holding a recent policy meeting:

Screen Shot 2013-04-19 At 10.16.57 Am
[SOURCE: Anti-gay FRC video @ :29 mark]

Only thing? It's a complete fabrication. FRC simply Photoshopped a Boy Scout logo and a "2013 Policy Meeting" placard onto an existing picture that they lifted from another site. The picture in question is actually from the website LegalGeekery.com and is described as being from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts:

75432958 0C1Ed6De27 O
[SOURCE: LegalGeekery.com]

As far as we know, none of the people pictured are involved in scouting. But hey, whatevs. FRC needed some sort of visual, so they just took one and repurposed it. Voilà—instant BSA policy meeting!

Then again, this is the organization that takes any judicial body that sides with equality and frames it as "unfair" and "activist." They have a penchant for misrepresenting courtrooms, it would seem.

Pagebreak-227

*Want to support this site, its mission, its tone, and its daily investigations? The absolute best way is to purchase or download Jeremy's book, which you can do here. All of its pictures are legit.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails