NOM crowdsourcing its messaging
The latest post on NOM's Facebook:
As we'd expect, the vast majority of NOM supporters have responded with some sort of biblical argument, even though our debate is about *CIVIL* marriage. Though surprisingly, none of them seem to mention the many concepts (man and many wives; man, wives and concubines; virgin and rapist; male warrior and POW; man, woman, and the woman's property (i.e slaves); etc.) that a logical extension of biblical marriage "tradition" would demand.
comments powered by Disqus