RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/08/2013

Bryan Fischer: Inclusive immigration reform would be 'importing' 'sexual dysfunction'

by Jeremy Hooper

Sen Patrick Leahy (D-VT) has announced plans to introduce amendments that would allow same-sex couples the same rights that many opposite-sex couples take for granted (e.g. the ability to sponsor foreign partners for green cards; equal protection for binational couples; etc.). But this is what that ol' charmer Bryan Fischer (of the American Family Association) has to say about the proposal:

Screen Shot 2013-05-08 At 8.31.08 Am

Shades of what Bryan's pal Peter Sprigg (of the Family Research Council) said just a few years back:


*SOURCE: Gays seek immigration reform [Medill Reports]

We shouldn't import "sexual dysfunction"? We should "export homosexuals"? Gee, if I didn't know they were nice Christians who identify by their "values," I might think they were suggesting some truly frightening things about LGBT and our worth.

I'm thinking that just to be safe, we should go ahead and take these and related voices out of this whole debate. They've already forfeited.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails