RECENT  POSTS:  » Maggie 'always-the-victim' Gallagher did nothing to earn her anti-gay reputation » Anti-gay activists still don't realize 'recruitment' claims make them look ridiculous » Florida pro-discrimination activist John Stemberger's history leaves no room for LGBT people » Read: Federal Judge strikes down Florida marriage ban; stays ruling » Video: Southern Baptists promote upcoming anti-gay (and pro-'ex-gay') conference » The marriage debate per anti-LGBT, pro-discrimination activist » AFA's daily prayer equates homosexuality with incest, bestiality, pedophilia » GLAAD: What FRC's exploitation of Robin Williams' death is really about » Scott Lively's new mission: Making America's churches super-duper extra anti-gay » BYU protects the sanctity of pre-printed greetings  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/14/2013

Minnesota either attacked by aliens, hijacked by terrorists, or blessed with marriage equality; you decide

by Jeremy Hooper

When his organization used the state legislature to pass a (voter-rejected) marriage amendment, it was just fair practice. But when those in favor of equal civil rights for taxpayers in same-sex relationships passed marriage equality bill? Why is was a "hostile takeover," don't 'cha know?

So says MFC president Tom Prichard:

Screen Shot 2013-05-14 At 10.52.56 Am"Polls at the beginning of the legislative session showed the majority of Minnesotans support traditional marriage,"…"and one poll showed only 38 percent supported redefining marriage. Definitely I don't think Minnesotans wanted this, and in some respects, we view it as a hostile takeover."

Minnesota Family Council president Tom Prichard
(*see more of Prichard's rhetoric here)

And in what respect would that be, Mr. Prichard? I'd really love to hear how the duly elected legislature's passage of a clean bill is either "hostile" or a "takeover," especially coming six months after the state's voters rejected the anti-gay side at the polls.

I think by "in some respects," Mr. Prichard really means "in a manner that will rile up anger through loose language." That's certainly something. I wouldn't, however, use the word "respect" anywhere in the same sentence.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails