RECENT  POSTS:  » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit » Photo: The latest totally convincing, in no way silly attempt at a meme from anti-gay Ruth Institute » AFA's Fischer: Time for Christians to 'get up in somebody's grill' like Jesus would » GLAAD: The World Congress of Families sparks protests in Australia. Let's examine why. » GLAAD: NOM cofounder: 'Hard to see... the logical stopping place' between gay-affirming, murder-affirming Christians » 'Nonpartisan' NOM's entrenched Republicanism again showing » GLAAD: His other tactics failing, NOM president turns to anti-trans fear-mongering » AFA's Bryan Fischer: Diversity is 'most sinister and dangerous lie'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/13/2013

Minnesota For Marriage claims ownership of church, mothers

by Jeremy Hooper

Posted on Sunday:

Screen Shot 2013-05-13 At 8.29.46 Am

Posted today:

Screen Shot 2013-05-13 At 8.29.40 Am

Okay, first off: "Mothers" is not a term in marriage law. What a sham thing to say!

And the second one: Nowadays, the main people using the word "bigots" in these marriage debates are those on the side of self-victimization. Those of us who are pushing for marriage equality are not, by and large, focusing on motivation. Our supportive legislators certainly aren't. We're focused on the deserved right to civil marriage, which is always—ALWAYS, EVERY TIME!—separated from the ancillary religious ceremony that a couple may or may not opt into.

Give it up, MN For Marriage. This desperation is unbecoming.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails