RECENT  POSTS:  » Conservative proposes new way for vendors to tell gay customers they don't care for them » NOM versus David Koch » Anti-equality baseball player calls reporter 'a prick' for asking about his anti-equality advocacy » Audio: Josh Duggar defends discrimination, invalidates own point » Audio: AFA's Fischer names 'homosexual agenda' as 'greatest threat to liberty' in American history » Audio: AFA Radio caller calls for executing gays; FRC-employed host doesn't even challenge him, much less condemn » NOM president's other organization is 'in trouble' (his words) too » FRC prays to take LGBT Americans out of nondiscrimination law » In lieu of typing 'Look how desperate we are' over and over again, NOM president wrote this instead » I'll remind you that FRC also compared our marriages to human-horse unions  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/13/2013

Minnesota For Marriage claims ownership of church, mothers

by Jeremy Hooper

Posted on Sunday:

Screen Shot 2013-05-13 At 8.29.46 Am

Posted today:

Screen Shot 2013-05-13 At 8.29.40 Am

Okay, first off: "Mothers" is not a term in marriage law. What a sham thing to say!

And the second one: Nowadays, the main people using the word "bigots" in these marriage debates are those on the side of self-victimization. Those of us who are pushing for marriage equality are not, by and large, focusing on motivation. Our supportive legislators certainly aren't. We're focused on the deserved right to civil marriage, which is always—ALWAYS, EVERY TIME!—separated from the ancillary religious ceremony that a couple may or may not opt into.

Give it up, MN For Marriage. This desperation is unbecoming.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails