RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/13/2013

Minnesota For Marriage claims ownership of church, mothers

by Jeremy Hooper

Posted on Sunday:

Screen Shot 2013-05-13 At 8.29.46 Am

Posted today:

Screen Shot 2013-05-13 At 8.29.40 Am

Okay, first off: "Mothers" is not a term in marriage law. What a sham thing to say!

And the second one: Nowadays, the main people using the word "bigots" in these marriage debates are those on the side of self-victimization. Those of us who are pushing for marriage equality are not, by and large, focusing on motivation. Our supportive legislators certainly aren't. We're focused on the deserved right to civil marriage, which is always—ALWAYS, EVERY TIME!—separated from the ancillary religious ceremony that a couple may or may not opt into.

Give it up, MN For Marriage. This desperation is unbecoming.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails