RECENT  POSTS:  » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


Minnesota For Marriage claims ownership of church, mothers

by Jeremy Hooper

Posted on Sunday:

Screen Shot 2013-05-13 At 8.29.46 Am

Posted today:

Screen Shot 2013-05-13 At 8.29.40 Am

Okay, first off: "Mothers" is not a term in marriage law. What a sham thing to say!

And the second one: Nowadays, the main people using the word "bigots" in these marriage debates are those on the side of self-victimization. Those of us who are pushing for marriage equality are not, by and large, focusing on motivation. Our supportive legislators certainly aren't. We're focused on the deserved right to civil marriage, which is always—ALWAYS, EVERY TIME!—separated from the ancillary religious ceremony that a couple may or may not opt into.

Give it up, MN For Marriage. This desperation is unbecoming.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails