RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead) » Full trailer: 'The Normal Heart' » Vintage Clinton era oppo memo perhaps even more relevant today » Concerned Women For America advises churches to lockdown exclusionary marriage views » Video: What does conservative columnist Cal Thomas see as America's biggest threat? Take a guess. » Correcting NOM's fallacious fear graphic » Gee, Bryan, can't understand why federal courts are rejecting you gay = incest view » Former NOM sr. associate admits shift: Moving away from intellectual arguments, focusing on spiritual » Prop 8 defense attorney now planning lesbian daughter's wedding » If you can't afford your event, NOM, perhaps you should just cancel  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/09/2013

MN For Marriage confuses 'Respect All' with 'Erase'

by Jeremy Hooper

Meanwhile in Minnesota, this seems to be the most popular kind of sign at today's House vote on marriage:

Screen Shot 2013-05-09 At 12.30.33 Pm
Screen Shot 2013-05-09 At 12.31.07 Pm

Such noise. The marriage bill will respect all marriages and, by extension, show greater respect to those who choose to have children. No erasure necessary or sought.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails