RECENT  POSTS:  » 'Ex-gay' org. excited to be 'featured exhibitor' at #VVS14 » Three of history's four women Supreme Court Justices have now performed same-sex weddings » GLAAD: Questions we'd like reporters to ask at the Values Voter Summit » HA! Robert Oscar Lopez mentions me in truly bizarre amicus brief to 5th Circuit » Gay man realizes he shouldn't have entered an opposite-sex union—so no same-sex marriage for anyone?! » Your daily 'Gay Gestapo' moment with the American Family Association's senior analyst » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/09/2013

MN For Marriage confuses 'Respect All' with 'Erase'

by Jeremy Hooper

Meanwhile in Minnesota, this seems to be the most popular kind of sign at today's House vote on marriage:

Screen Shot 2013-05-09 At 12.30.33 Pm
Screen Shot 2013-05-09 At 12.31.07 Pm

Such noise. The marriage bill will respect all marriages and, by extension, show greater respect to those who choose to have children. No erasure necessary or sought.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails