RECENT  POSTS:  » GLAAD: Q&A with former 'ex-gay' activist Yvette Schneider: 'I’ve never met an 'ex-gay' man I thought was not still attracted to men' » Head of Virginia's anti-equality org: 'open season to discriminate against anyone who believes that children deserve a mom and a dad' » Force behind Virginia's marriage ban ably demonstrates animus behind it » NOM to show rest of world its impressive ability to exacerbate loss » Bryan Fischer: Marriage equality supporters are like baseball's legendarily winning team » On NC's Attorney General and the bipartisan hunt for a 'culture war' off ramp » Read: 4th Circuit strikes down Virginia marriage ban » GLAAD: Change is possible: Former 'ex-gay' activist Yvette Schneider 'celebrates the worthiness and equality of all people' » Man who stands in way of Texas equality works to stunt economic windfall as well » Miami-Dade Circuit judge rules state marriage ban unconstitutional; stays ruling  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/25/2013

But what if God has neither judged nor apologized in subsequent 48 years?

by Jeremy Hooper

Anti-LGBT figures love to cite this quote:

Screen Shot 2013-06-25 At 9.45.06 Am

Only thing? Ruth Graham (the late wife of Billy) actually uttered these words in 1965—a full forty-eight years ago. She said this in a pre-Stonewall era, at a time when LGBT people didn't have the first right, benefit, or protection to speak of. Ruth Graham was speaking of what she considered the ills of the early-to-mid '60s, a time that many modern conservatives would look back on with fondness.

As far as I can tell, God hasn't cast any kind of fire and brimstone on America in this past half-century. But wait a minute—Ruth Graham said that he had to do so. She said that if God didn't do so then he would have to apologize. As best I can tell, God has not done that either.

This all being so, one could argue that it's the Christian conservatives who appropriate this half-century-old quote who really need to apologize for so aggressively claiming to know a benevolent heart whose true understanding seems to elude them. After all, they (and namely Ruth Graham) are the ones who used their human minds to put a direct command into the anger bank of a supernatural being. Isn't that a little presumptuous? Isn't it a little judgmental toward the creator himself? And since God hasn't taken his marching orders, couldn't one claim that God is less like, "You're right, I should totally smite the sinners!" and more like, "Back the heck off, self-proclaimed 'family values" crowd—I kind of know what I'm doing here!"?

I think so.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails