RECENT  POSTS:  » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way » On Rivka, Robert and their dirty, self-victimizing, anti-intellectual blame game » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/24/2013

FRC's SCOTUS 'expert' already admitted he'd like to 'export'/criminalize us; hasn't he said enough?

by Jeremy Hooper

With the Supreme Court decisions on marriage seemingly imminent, the rabidly anti-gay Family Research Council is pitching Peter Sprigg as one of its "expert" pundits:

Screen Shot 2013-06-24 At 8.26.49 Am

That would be this Peter Sprigg:


*SOURCE: Gays seek immigration reform [Medill Reports]

*SOURCE: MSNBC

If you see a place for either criminal sanctions or deportation for the supposed "crime" of homosexuality, doesn't that pretty much trump whatever you say on the issue of marriage? I kind of think so. And I kind of think that any media outlet that chooses to book Mr. Sprigg owes it to the audience to flesh out his full profile!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails