RECENT  POSTS:  » Your anti-LGBT movement at work: Viciously denigrating stock photos of gay families » Maggie Gallagher's latest shows what a disservice she did to the *civil* marriage debate » Brian Brown apparently buying a new dinette set, misapplies purchase to marriage debate » Focus on the Family: Marriage equality activists are 'tyrants'; opponents are 'slaves' » Read: Zack Ford smacks back Ryan Anderson's love of tax-subsidized discrimination » God Hates Fads: Radical Bay State group pretends homosexuality is like skinny jeans » But does the Archbishop even believe in gay? » Video: Move over aliens, plagues, Sharknados—it's committed gays who'll soon kill Western Civilization » Nine former water-carriers for 'ex-gayness' join all credible scientists in denouncing 'ex-gay' propaganda » The operative word is 'yet'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/24/2013

FRC's SCOTUS 'expert' already admitted he'd like to 'export'/criminalize us; hasn't he said enough?

by Jeremy Hooper

With the Supreme Court decisions on marriage seemingly imminent, the rabidly anti-gay Family Research Council is pitching Peter Sprigg as one of its "expert" pundits:

Screen Shot 2013-06-24 At 8.26.49 Am

That would be this Peter Sprigg:


*SOURCE: Gays seek immigration reform [Medill Reports]

*SOURCE: MSNBC

If you see a place for either criminal sanctions or deportation for the supposed "crime" of homosexuality, doesn't that pretty much trump whatever you say on the issue of marriage? I kind of think so. And I kind of think that any media outlet that chooses to book Mr. Sprigg owes it to the audience to flesh out his full profile!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails