RECENT  POSTS:  » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/28/2013

Robert Knight admits gay households are *slightly* better than burning buildings

by Jeremy Hooper

See, you guys, the other side isn't animus-driven. That's crazy talk! I mean, just listen in to the following clip. Their spokespeople are totally willing to concede that our homes are at least marginally better for children than are burning buildings:


*Source: Janet Mefferd, 6/27/13

Oh wait a minute, no—forget what I said above. Their side is totally animus-driven. Constantly. Hourly. It's like their spokespeople have some sort of quota to fill or something. It's bizarre, frankly.

So let me close with one tip to those on the other side: If you want to deny that gays are the victims of your long held game to demonize us, it's probably better to no couple that with a funny little anecdote telling America that our families are only slightly better than arson. Just a suggestion; I don't expect you to take it.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails