RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay American Family Association claims the discriminatory business owner is our modern-day Hester Prynne » Focus on the Family fundraising at intersection of self-centeredness and anti-gayness » Count the lies in this Values Voter Summit description » Video: If nothing else will get you to 'Ex-gay Awareness Dinner' then this will—not do the trick either » Video: Bill Donohue on early '90s gay 'animals' and their 'Nazi-like invasions' » Video: Two dads + four kids = one representation of Florida's many denied, discriminated against families » Survey: Catholic leadership's never-ending attacks on gay people's peace is regressing church's acceptance levels » GLAAD: Anti-LGBT activist wishes US punished LGBT people by life imprisonment, just like Uganda and Gambia » Head of Chicago Archdiocese equates LGBT accomodation with forced sharia law » NOM to Oregon: We will not let your dead horses rest; please direct us to your whips and paddles  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/06/2013

Why don't you show what Rep. Blumenauer actually said, NOM?

by Jeremy Hooper

NOM, the National Review, and a host of conservatives have posted the same video:

Screen Shot 2013-06-06 At 1.11.18 Pm
Screen Shot 2013-06-06 At 1.11.31 Pm
Screen Shot 2013-06-06 At 1.11.49 Pm

They are all pushing this 2:07 clip, claiming NOM chairman John Eastman "ripped" eight-term congressman Earl Blumenauer (D-OR3). The clip plays as follows, complete with movement-affirming applause from the partisan audience filled, as it was, with Tea party supporters:

The thing is, when one posts a video of a figure purporting to "rip" or "fire back" at someone for his supposedly "scurrilous" statements, one usually shows the audience what, exactly, that someone said. But in this case, none of those conservatives did that. Not NOM. Not NRO. Not any of them. There isn't a single video of Rep. Blumenauer's comments anywhere on Youtube. They don't show how he noted NOM's stated desire to "drive a wedge between gays and blacks," and they don't address any of his pointed questions about whether NOM, an overtly political and highly partisan group that is obviously in the tank for Republicans (remember that NOM prez Brian brown also runs the partisan ActRight operation), should even qualify as a social welfare organization. They all run Eastman's response without any context.

So let's fix that. Here's what the Democratic congressman said, start to finish:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails