RECENT  POSTS:  » 'Indianapolis Star' to Governor Pence: FIX THIS NOW » Bill Maher's monologue on dialogue he'd prefer remain a monologue » Video: Even Michael Steele thinks Indiana law is too broad; Ryan T. Anderson constantly interrupts, still loses » Watch Gov. Pence heap praise on lobbying group that admitted #SB101 was all about same-sex marriage » Shellshocked Gov. Pence in full-blown spin mode » Video: Man who's called for exporting gays goes on CNN to defend Indiana law, earns deserved result » Man who insinuated it's better to be thrown into sea than support homosexuality attended #SB101 signing ceremony » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/06/2013

Why don't you show what Rep. Blumenauer actually said, NOM?

by Jeremy Hooper

NOM, the National Review, and a host of conservatives have posted the same video:

Screen Shot 2013-06-06 At 1.11.18 Pm
Screen Shot 2013-06-06 At 1.11.31 Pm
Screen Shot 2013-06-06 At 1.11.49 Pm

They are all pushing this 2:07 clip, claiming NOM chairman John Eastman "ripped" eight-term congressman Earl Blumenauer (D-OR3). The clip plays as follows, complete with movement-affirming applause from the partisan audience filled, as it was, with Tea party supporters:

The thing is, when one posts a video of a figure purporting to "rip" or "fire back" at someone for his supposedly "scurrilous" statements, one usually shows the audience what, exactly, that someone said. But in this case, none of those conservatives did that. Not NOM. Not NRO. Not any of them. There isn't a single video of Rep. Blumenauer's comments anywhere on Youtube. They don't show how he noted NOM's stated desire to "drive a wedge between gays and blacks," and they don't address any of his pointed questions about whether NOM, an overtly political and highly partisan group that is obviously in the tank for Republicans (remember that NOM prez Brian brown also runs the partisan ActRight operation), should even qualify as a social welfare organization. They all run Eastman's response without any context.

So let's fix that. Here's what the Democratic congressman said, start to finish:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails