RECENT  POSTS:  » Court upholds Houston's Equal Rights Ordinance » Maggie Gallagher won't toast you while you trap your spouse in sin » NOM pre-spins its likely low #March4Marriage attendance » 'Children of gays' lawyer to SCOTUS: Ban same-sex marriage so bisexuals will marry heterosexually » Audio: Ryan T. Anderson says sexual orientation speaks to content of character; links it to sadomasochism, polyamory » WHOA: FRC 'reediting' all those heinous fasting-for-marriage prayers I've been showing you!! » Man who dedicates his life to fighting marriage equality, gay parenting: 'I don't work to harm others' » FRC's eighth day of fasting-for-discrimination: Uses passage about forced drowning to condemn gay parents » NOM: Marriage is some creepy number that looks like it's about to behead one spouse » Desperate anti-gay movement's latest attempt to dehumanize: Gay unions harm straight kids  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/06/2013

Why don't you show what Rep. Blumenauer actually said, NOM?

by Jeremy Hooper

NOM, the National Review, and a host of conservatives have posted the same video:

Screen Shot 2013-06-06 At 1.11.18 Pm
Screen Shot 2013-06-06 At 1.11.31 Pm
Screen Shot 2013-06-06 At 1.11.49 Pm

They are all pushing this 2:07 clip, claiming NOM chairman John Eastman "ripped" eight-term congressman Earl Blumenauer (D-OR3). The clip plays as follows, complete with movement-affirming applause from the partisan audience filled, as it was, with Tea party supporters:

The thing is, when one posts a video of a figure purporting to "rip" or "fire back" at someone for his supposedly "scurrilous" statements, one usually shows the audience what, exactly, that someone said. But in this case, none of those conservatives did that. Not NOM. Not NRO. Not any of them. There isn't a single video of Rep. Blumenauer's comments anywhere on Youtube. They don't show how he noted NOM's stated desire to "drive a wedge between gays and blacks," and they don't address any of his pointed questions about whether NOM, an overtly political and highly partisan group that is obviously in the tank for Republicans (remember that NOM prez Brian brown also runs the partisan ActRight operation), should even qualify as a social welfare organization. They all run Eastman's response without any context.

So let's fix that. Here's what the Democratic congressman said, start to finish:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails