RECENT  POSTS:  » One of America's most anti-gay organizations rallies for the Duggars; because of course they would » Photo: Stop! Turn around! Don't let NOM force you onto the dead-end pier that is their cause! » One day, two country singers—zero closets » Fringe pro-discrimination group thinks it can stop companies from sponsoring HRC event; adorable » Video: Josh Duggar promoting civil inequality for thousands of grown kids (and counting) » Brian Brown's focus on Kansas, Gov. Brownback shows how much of a political game this is for him » Tiny fraction of North Carolina magistrates choose to free up their days rather than serve local gays » Video: Reality star Josh Duggar leads sad little inequality rally in Little Rock, AR » READ: Federal judge strikes Montana's discriminatory marriage ban » Major global brand P&G comes out for marriage equality  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/22/2013

Cohabiting couples are at disadvantage, says org that leaves gay couples with no other option

by Jeremy Hooper

The National Organization For Marriage aggressively opposes marriage for same-sex couples and, when it comes down to it, always opposes even a civil union setup (even when they pretend to support them because local polling forces their hand). That being true, it's so unbelievably offensive for NOM to promote ideas like this one:

Screen Shot 2013-07-22 At 8.29.30 Am

So where does this leave same-sex couples? If NOM staffers truly believe that cohabiting couples will always fall behind married couples, doesn't that just add an extra level of insult (and animus) to the NOM agenda?

Now, of course NOM doesn't believe same-sex couples even qualify for marriage, so they would say that the only way we can reap the claimed benefits is to pick an opposite-sex spouse and find a way to love him or her. But that only ratchets up the cruelty. In NOM's world, married heterosexuals receive a pedestal from which to cast stones at the peons below. In NOM's world, gender-different married couples are to receive a subsidization that the rest of us taxpayers must support but from which some of us are never allowed to benefit. In NOM's world, a gay couple never has an equal shake at the same sort of familial productivity that they make so readily available to opposite-sex duos.

Fortunately, we get to live in the real world, not NOM's world.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails