RECENT  POSTS:  » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open » Video: 'Ex-gay' speaker at upcoming ERLC summit equates talking to gay people with talking to cancer patients » GLAAD: Mainstream media is catching on to NOM's broader agenda » FRC's Values Voter Summit puts anti-gay bakers on a marriage panel; so we won, basically » GOP front group NOM raising money for a GOP US Senate  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/22/2013

Cohabiting couples are at disadvantage, says org that leaves gay couples with no other option

by Jeremy Hooper

The National Organization For Marriage aggressively opposes marriage for same-sex couples and, when it comes down to it, always opposes even a civil union setup (even when they pretend to support them because local polling forces their hand). That being true, it's so unbelievably offensive for NOM to promote ideas like this one:

Screen Shot 2013-07-22 At 8.29.30 Am

So where does this leave same-sex couples? If NOM staffers truly believe that cohabiting couples will always fall behind married couples, doesn't that just add an extra level of insult (and animus) to the NOM agenda?

Now, of course NOM doesn't believe same-sex couples even qualify for marriage, so they would say that the only way we can reap the claimed benefits is to pick an opposite-sex spouse and find a way to love him or her. But that only ratchets up the cruelty. In NOM's world, married heterosexuals receive a pedestal from which to cast stones at the peons below. In NOM's world, gender-different married couples are to receive a subsidization that the rest of us taxpayers must support but from which some of us are never allowed to benefit. In NOM's world, a gay couple never has an equal shake at the same sort of familial productivity that they make so readily available to opposite-sex duos.

Fortunately, we get to live in the real world, not NOM's world.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails