RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/26/2013

NOM's Jennifer Roback Morse on Edie Windsor: She didn't want to pay for 'her friend's' estate

by Jeremy Hooper

On August 6, 2012, the Disqus user "posterchild1" left a comment identifying herself as the person who booked ITAF, the annual conference of the National Organization For Marriage's Ruth Institute:

Screen Shot 2013-07-26 At 10.42.53 Am
[SOURCE]

"Posterchild1" also left this comment linking herself to Ruth:

Screen Shot 2013-07-26 At 10.46.44 Am
[SOURCE]

Also, the Facebook page linked to this account points backs to Jennifer Roback Morse, the Ruth Institute's head:

201307261037-2

And, up until yesterday, the person who operates this account was using a photo of Ms. Roback Morse as her avatar:

Screen Shot 2013-07-26 At 10.45.44 Am

This all being the case, I'm quite comfortable saying this is Jennifer Roback Morse's account, even if she has left comments on her own ActRight petition that make it seem like she is just some random commenter:

Screen Shot 2013-07-25 At 1.13.44 Pm
[SOURCE]

Clearly it's her, which is probably why she changed to a more neutral avatar right after I called her out on the ActRight thread.

Screen Shot 2013-07-26 At 10.57.15 Am
[SOURCE]

So yeah—ha! However, masked identity is not really what I want to focus on here. Instead, I want you to see the low regard that Ms. Roback Morse has for Edie Windsor's thirty-five year commitment to Thea Speyer:

Screen Shot 2013-07-25 At 1.16.04 Pm
[SOURCE]

Yes, that's right—this senior NOM staffer refers to Thea Speyer as Edie Windsor's "friend." She can't even acknowledge, much less dignify, the longterm commitment that these two shared. Instead, she refers to Edie as some random rich person involved in a personal choice between two buddies. Thea is written off as just some bygone pal.

Is this really the kind of cold disregard the marriage movement wants coming from their "poster child"?

Pagebreak-329

**UPDATE: Yup, this is definitely her. Earlir this week, Ms. Morse used virtually the same "rich"/"friend" language on Catholic radio: NOM’s Morse: Edith Windsor Is Part Of The “Ruling Class,” Doesn’t Need Federal Marriage Benefits [EQ Matters]

Pagebreak-329

**UPDATE2: And now they closed down all comments. Because that's how our opposition always responds to sunlight.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails