RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/10/2013

Not as 'telling' as you think, NOM Comm. Director

by Jeremy Hooper

His new line:

Screen Shot 2013-07-10 At 11.01.16 Am


We think it’s very telling gay marriage advocates are using the courts so heavily,” …“They only support the voice of the people when they think it go their way.

National Org. For Marriage's Communications Director Thomas Peters

First off: Maine, Maryland, Washington, Minnesota, Delaware, Rhode Island. In the past eight months, all six of those states have fought for and won marriage equality. None of them were court battles.

But that out of the way, let me be the first to tell Thomas: YES, we do in fact like the courts! Why? Because courts are the venues where spin, press releases, talking points, flawed research, and popularity contests meet a much higher level of scrutiny. In a court, an organization like NOM can't just pull things from its behind and have everyone accept those arse-derived bullet points as fact. Courts demand better, which is why we do so well in the courts and why the Prop 8 proponents presented an astonishingly terrible case several times over. It's also why the far-right has been on a decades-long war against the judiciary, starting and maintaining the anti-intellectual "activist judges" meme.

So while Thomas seems to think he's found us out or something, the truth does not line up with his talking point. We've never hid the fact that we actually do value the judiciary, but we also have not spent the past year relying solely on it. We're winning in every venue and at every branch [reminder: a majority of U.S. Senators (i.e. Legislative branch) and our President (i.e. Executive branch) also support marriage equality].

Pagebreak-323

**Moments after my post, Thomas tweeted this:

Screen Shot 2013-07-10 At 3.31.15 Pm

Um, how ya figure there, bud? We outspent your side because more people felt compelled to give to our side. That alone speaks volumes about where we are, where we're headed, and the trend lines surrounding public support.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails