RECENT  POSTS:  » Photo: NOM thinks its discriminatory cause is young and hip; adorable » An inside look at POTUS's evolution circa 2011–2012 » More animus from Texas' key 'protect marriage' guy » GLAAD: Why would we silence unwittingly helpful voices like yours, Peter LaBarbera? » Photo: NOM fully (and finally) owning its wholly faith-driven root » Our winning movement wins another one: Judge says Ohio must recognize out-of-state marriages » Video: Tony Perkins is pissssssssssssed at Chick-fil-a » You must be so proud of this headline, @ChristianPost » READ: Full page 'NY Times' ad pleas to supposedly refreshing new Pope: Take strong stand for LGBT youth » Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth, and—activists who try to strip certain citizens of certain civil rights?!  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/10/2013

Not as 'telling' as you think, NOM Comm. Director

by Jeremy Hooper

His new line:

Screen Shot 2013-07-10 At 11.01.16 Am


We think it’s very telling gay marriage advocates are using the courts so heavily,” …“They only support the voice of the people when they think it go their way.

National Org. For Marriage's Communications Director Thomas Peters

First off: Maine, Maryland, Washington, Minnesota, Delaware, Rhode Island. In the past eight months, all six of those states have fought for and won marriage equality. None of them were court battles.

But that out of the way, let me be the first to tell Thomas: YES, we do in fact like the courts! Why? Because courts are the venues where spin, press releases, talking points, flawed research, and popularity contests meet a much higher level of scrutiny. In a court, an organization like NOM can't just pull things from its behind and have everyone accept those arse-derived bullet points as fact. Courts demand better, which is why we do so well in the courts and why the Prop 8 proponents presented an astonishingly terrible case several times over. It's also why the far-right has been on a decades-long war against the judiciary, starting and maintaining the anti-intellectual "activist judges" meme.

So while Thomas seems to think he's found us out or something, the truth does not line up with his talking point. We've never hid the fact that we actually do value the judiciary, but we also have not spent the past year relying solely on it. We're winning in every venue and at every branch [reminder: a majority of U.S. Senators (i.e. Legislative branch) and our President (i.e. Executive branch) also support marriage equality].

Pagebreak-323

**Moments after my post, Thomas tweeted this:

Screen Shot 2013-07-10 At 3.31.15 Pm

Um, how ya figure there, bud? We outspent your side because more people felt compelled to give to our side. That alone speaks volumes about where we are, where we're headed, and the trend lines surrounding public support.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails