RECENT  POSTS:  » AP report: FDA to recommend end on gay blood ban! (*UPDATED with big restriction) » Video: Another ad reflects changing (already changed?) 'Tide' » Anti-gay NOM compares its discriminatory cause to baby Jesus's early infant care » SCOTUS to begin new year by pondering outdated inequality » Video: TLC to air show about humans' ability to suppress truth in name of religion » AFA, LaBarbera think being publicly pro-gay is still a liability; how quaint » Video: Blended family with lesbian moms heads Tylenol holiday ad » NOM's new conspiracy theory: Census Bureau making changes to hide marriage equality's ill effects » Video: Voices from our pro-equality future (present?) » Anti-gay orgs continue to offend children of single parents, gay parents, more  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/10/2013

Not as 'telling' as you think, NOM Comm. Director

by Jeremy Hooper

His new line:

Screen Shot 2013-07-10 At 11.01.16 Am


We think it’s very telling gay marriage advocates are using the courts so heavily,” …“They only support the voice of the people when they think it go their way.

National Org. For Marriage's Communications Director Thomas Peters

First off: Maine, Maryland, Washington, Minnesota, Delaware, Rhode Island. In the past eight months, all six of those states have fought for and won marriage equality. None of them were court battles.

But that out of the way, let me be the first to tell Thomas: YES, we do in fact like the courts! Why? Because courts are the venues where spin, press releases, talking points, flawed research, and popularity contests meet a much higher level of scrutiny. In a court, an organization like NOM can't just pull things from its behind and have everyone accept those arse-derived bullet points as fact. Courts demand better, which is why we do so well in the courts and why the Prop 8 proponents presented an astonishingly terrible case several times over. It's also why the far-right has been on a decades-long war against the judiciary, starting and maintaining the anti-intellectual "activist judges" meme.

So while Thomas seems to think he's found us out or something, the truth does not line up with his talking point. We've never hid the fact that we actually do value the judiciary, but we also have not spent the past year relying solely on it. We're winning in every venue and at every branch [reminder: a majority of U.S. Senators (i.e. Legislative branch) and our President (i.e. Executive branch) also support marriage equality].

Pagebreak-323

**Moments after my post, Thomas tweeted this:

Screen Shot 2013-07-10 At 3.31.15 Pm

Um, how ya figure there, bud? We outspent your side because more people felt compelled to give to our side. That alone speaks volumes about where we are, where we're headed, and the trend lines surrounding public support.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails