RECENT  POSTS:  » Court upholds Houston's Equal Rights Ordinance » Maggie Gallagher won't toast you while you trap your spouse in sin » NOM pre-spins its likely low #March4Marriage attendance » 'Children of gays' lawyer to SCOTUS: Ban same-sex marriage so bisexuals will marry heterosexually » Audio: Ryan T. Anderson says sexual orientation speaks to content of character; links it to sadomasochism, polyamory » WHOA: FRC 'reediting' all those heinous fasting-for-marriage prayers I've been showing you!! » Man who dedicates his life to fighting marriage equality, gay parenting: 'I don't work to harm others' » FRC's eighth day of fasting-for-discrimination: Uses passage about forced drowning to condemn gay parents » NOM: Marriage is some creepy number that looks like it's about to behead one spouse » Desperate anti-gay movement's latest attempt to dehumanize: Gay unions harm straight kids  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/19/2013

Two moms parenting on TV (as in real life)? Not on Alison Howard's watch!

by Jeremy Hooper

The Disney channels series Good Luck Charlie is set to introduce an openly married couple that happens to be made up of two women. "THIS MUSTN'T Screen Shot 2013-07-19 At 8.10.30 AmSTAND!" vows the Concerned Women For America's far-too-young-to-be-so-mad-at-gays staffer, Alison Howard:

"They’re looking to gage public reaction," [Howard] comments. "[So] let's give them some feedback then. This is where parents need to step up and let their voice be heard.

“You need to not let this go by [because] this is the beginning of something big for Disney and other companies if they don't hear a reaction from people who disagree." [SOURCE:
ONN]

The beginning of "something big," Alison, or the beginning of something real? Because whether you like it or not (and we get it—you do not), same-sex couples exist. And we marry. And we parent. And we visit other people's houses. That's not some secret agenda—it just quite simply is.

And actually, you do not to just "let this go by." I know, Al, that your religious right employers have convinced you that "culture warring" is a thing worth sustaining and that LGBT people are a group worth protesting. Little hint: they're duping you, just like they've been duping America for the past few decades. In truth, we as a people don't need special interest groups that take it upon themselves to rise up in rage whenever human beings who are part of the fabric of America find their way into television characterization. We really don't. In fact, a growing majority of people would say that it's quite wrong to shake an angry fist at decent people (or their televised counterparts) who are simply going about their lives. Which is why I, if I were advising you, Alison, would dare you to be a truly radical conservative: one that eschews the LGBT-denigrating past and instead looks to build a more unified future.

Not to mention, if you consider Modern Family's runaway success with families across this nation, this "scream at the TV" campaign seems both tardy and ill-advised. It seems that "something big" is already out of the bag!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails