RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/01/2013

What Attorney General Harris said is true—and NOM *HATES* it

by Jeremy Hooper

It's no surprise to see the National Organization For Marriage going after California Attorney General Kamala Harris. For one, the strong marriage equality supporter is an obvious rising star in the Democratic party with a bright future ahead of her, so the decidedly Republican NOM wants to stop that. Obviously.

But more than just that, the truth is that Harris got the job that NOM's own chairman, John Eastman, truly wanted—and the job that NOM wanted him to have. Longtime readers might remember back when I reported on a swanky D.C. fundraiser that NOM threw for Eastman when the deeply conservative lawyer was trying to become California's Attorney General. NOM wanted him as Attorney General because NOM wanted the Prop 8 legal fight to go exactly opposite of how it went. Ultimately, Eastman didn't even make it out of his primary, which led to his taking the NOM chairmanship as a consolation prize—but NOM sure as heck wanted him there.

So no, it's no surprise that NOM is launching an entire fundraising campaign around the exceedingly awesome Harris and her supposedly out-of-line behavior:

Screen Shot 2013-07-01 At 4.26.28 Pm
[NOM's anti-Harris fundraising campaign]

However, if this pro-discrimination organization wants to launch a campaign, they should probably do better than the following video, which NOM is making the centerpiece of its anti-Harris attacks. Nothing she says in this clip (which NOM just up and lifted from PBS NewsHour, btw) is at all untrue or unfair:

Well, um, yeah—those who would like to wantonly deny citizens of their equal protection and their due process are now bystanders in this process. "Bystander" means person who is present at an event but who does not take an active role, and that is exactly where the Prop 8 proponents now are. As AG Harris notes, the people who oppose us have every right to speak out and express their frustrations, but they do not have the right—DO.NOT.HAVE.THE.RIGHT—to deny us of our rights. The court made that clear. There is nothing controversial about what the Attorney General said.

The Proposition 8 proponents who tried to actively take away our freedoms have lost their active role. Period. For this fight, they are now bystanders. They might be loud bystanders. They might be powerful bystanders. They might be intimidating bystanders. They might be nice bystanders. They might be angry bystanders. They might be any kind of bystander you can think of. However, they will not be actively able to futz with our freedoms. They tried that and they failed. Now they must accept.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails