RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/02/2013

After so much marriage talk, Maggie Gallagher seeks 'change'

by Jeremy Hooper

I have heard that Maggie Gallagher is trying to figure out where to take her career now that she's no longer with NOM and no longer writing her column. But I can honestly say that I didn't expect her to choose "ex-gay" water-carrier. That is, however, the role she seems really eager to play these days:

Screen Shot 2013-08-02 At 9.56.18 Am
[National Review Online]

In Maggie's latest, she cites scientific outlier and recent NARTH (National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality) keynoter Nicholas Cummings as "proof" that gay people can "change." One big reason why Maggie is in this game at all is because Maggie serves on the board of the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund, the organization (headed by the quite anti-gay Charles Limandri) that's fighting in court to defend the anti-scientific practices of JONAH (Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing). Maggie has always been quite dutiful; when she takes on a role with an org, she tends to be a company woman.

But it's crazy silly for Maggie to go down this road. She is already the inextricable face of the 21st century push to ban gay people from civil rights that a growing majority of people realize to be deserved freedoms. Does she really want to use her remaining capital to push a form of "change" that an even greater majority sees as too extreme to even be believed and that the vast majority of credible scientists see as downright misguided (/dangerous)?

Not that my longtime two-step partner wants career advice from the likes of me. But, well—wow.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails