RECENT  POSTS:  » Gee, Bryan, can't understand why federal courts are rejecting you gay = incest view » Former NOM sr. associate admits shift: Moving away from intellectual arguments, focusing on spiritual » Prop 8 defense attorney now planning lesbian daughter's wedding » If you can't afford your event, NOM, perhaps you should just cancel » A hill of beans: 'Ex-gay'-defending legal firm selling coffee to fund discriminatory endeavors » Anti-gay talker Steve Deace lets LGBT movement know: we're about to sue churches, apparently » Audio: Bored on an apparently too factual weekday, Richard Land pushes 'gays are sexually abused' lie » It seems when you equate gay folk with those who sleep with animals, it sticks; funny how that works » Video: A new low for Robert Oscar Lopez; anti-gay 'bisexual' peddles offensive claims on Bryan Fischer's show » Southern Baptist's ERLC dedicating national conference to gay people, discrimination; better luck next year, homeless  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/30/2013

Audio: New Mexico state senator makes unwittingly revelatory correlation

by Jeremy Hooper

New Mexico state senator Bill Sharer (R-Farmington), who has been putting his foot in his mouth in all kinds of ways in the days since the marriage equality spotlight came to his state, went on Janet Mefferd's radio show yesterday, where he proceeded to make the following point about the New Mexico photographer who wanted to discriminate against gays:


[Janet Mefferd, 8/29/13]

What are the folks on the other side always saying about this case? They say that the photographer just wanted to act on her faith, right? They say she was just acting out of a loving conscience. They deny that it had anything to do with discrimination or animus. They certainly deny that a word like "hate" could be in play.

But now go back and listen to where Sen. Sharer's mind goes when he attempts to make an apt comparison. He instinctively links this situation to one in which a photographer hates Christians. That is what he sees as the fitting scenario from the other side. So wouldn't this, the correlation that he brings out to make his point, seem to suggest that he sees the photographer at the heart of this matter as hating gays? I mean, I'm not saying that—but he certainly seems to be!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails