RECENT  POSTS:  » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/05/2013

Can someone in D.C. please messenger definition of 'defend' to NOM's office? K, thanks

by Jeremy Hooper

My answer: "Remind my husband, here on his birthday week in this tenth wonderful year that we've been lucky enough to share together, of all the many things I love about him and our (soon-to-grow) family."

How do you respond to the National Organization For Marriage's query?

Screen Shot 2013-08-05 At 5.15.43 Pm
[SOURCE (*check out the responses, 99% of which are anti-NOM)

Oh, and of course I'll continue my goal of pushing NOM into the political wilderness. After all, no single group has done more to take away people's marriages over the past few years. Nothing will serve the institution more than NOM's inevitable retirement.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails