RECENT  POSTS:  » Tony Perkins: If American Christians accept SCOTUS marriage ruling, Christians will be killed elsewhere » What must drive the anti-gay activists crazy » I can't keep pretending to care about [insert activist] saying [insert ridiculous thing] » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/05/2013

Can someone in D.C. please messenger definition of 'defend' to NOM's office? K, thanks

by Jeremy Hooper

My answer: "Remind my husband, here on his birthday week in this tenth wonderful year that we've been lucky enough to share together, of all the many things I love about him and our (soon-to-grow) family."

How do you respond to the National Organization For Marriage's query?

Screen Shot 2013-08-05 At 5.15.43 Pm
[SOURCE (*check out the responses, 99% of which are anti-NOM)

Oh, and of course I'll continue my goal of pushing NOM into the political wilderness. After all, no single group has done more to take away people's marriages over the past few years. Nothing will serve the institution more than NOM's inevitable retirement.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails