RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/02/2013

'Homosexualist Justice Anthony Kennedy'

by Jeremy Hooper

The decidedly extreme Scott Lively has written yet another rabidly anti-gay column, this one about the Pope. You know his usual pattern: Blah, blah, blah…gays…blah, blah, blah…terrible…blah, blah, blah…I'm obsessed. It's all pretty boring, frankly.

There, is however, one thing of note: Scott Lively has taken it upon himself to determine Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy is a "homosexualist"

Screen Shot 2013-08-02 At 8.53.15 Am
[WND]

Which leads me to wonder if Lively and the like would be calling Justice Kennedy an "anti-homosexualist" if he had gone the other way. I mean, he has two general choices on DOMA: to go with it or against it. If they believe that his learned choice to go the route that a growing majority of Americans support makes him a "homosexualist," wouldn't his other choice have to make his anti-? Doesn't it mean that Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts must all be anti-homosexualists?

Of course that's not what would've happened. Had Kennedy gone the other way, the voices on the other side would be saying that the Reagan appointee was simply being fair. They would act as if his reasoned jurisprudence ruled the day, and they'd be gloating about the rational ruling that set back that pesky "homosexual agenda." We know that's what they'd be saying because that's the double standard they always use.

Scott Lively can't have it both ways. If Kennedy, Kagan, Sotomayor, Ginsburg, and Breyer are all "homosexualists," then he has to say that the conservative wing is decidedly anti-homosexualist. He's the one framing it that way, not me. And if that is the framework, then I'm more than confident about the future cases that will make their way to SCOTUS, a currently quite rigid body that is likely to become even less conservative over time.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails