RECENT  POSTS:  » 'WaPo' conservative columnist: 'Strident' marriage equality opponents have lost » If John Eastman's allowed to intervene in Oregon, I submit his endorsement of this very anti-gay book » I apparently can fly; cool, I've always wanted to! » Starving selves to stop others' happiness: Virginia edition » NOM-aligned organization claims God will soon punish us for pro-equality rulings » GLAAD: The rise of toxic terminology: Losing anti-LGBT movement turns to corrosive labeling » Founder of anti-gay Boy Scouts alternative links sexual orientation, adultery; earns merit badge in ill-intended comparisons » 'Playbill' to let the two previously unaware playgoers in on Broadway's love for gays » New record: Anti-gay activist Ralph Reed contradicts self in less than minute » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead)  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/27/2013

Must they inject a gay angle into everything?!

by Jeremy Hooper

Check out what Rush Limbaugh had to say about that ridiculous Miley Cyrus performance that for some reason I've been told to care about:

RUSH: Would these ruling class, erudite, elite women be as upset if Miley Cyrus had twerked with another woman instead of Robin Thicke? It would not be an issue. I'll bet you a dollar (and I have a few of those) that it would not be an issue. (interruption) You think so? Obama mighta called Miley to praise her for her heroism, had she twerked with another girl. Woman! Woman, sorry.
[
RushLimbaugh.com]

Um, yeah, I'm pretty sure that everyone's objections have to do with costuming, tongue-swirling, junk-grinding, and related elements of performance (from both performers). It wasn't about gender.

But no, I refuse to even go down this road. Instead, I have to ask the more pertinent question: why must these conservative commentators force us into every conversation!? This performance had nothing—zero, nada, zilch—to do with LGBT people, LGBT rights, or our related movement. Thicke's song is all about a man dinging to a woman (or women); Cyrus' is about a party. But yet here's Rush turning this around in order to make some sort of point about "elite women" and LGBT rights and supposed hypocrisy?! Ridiculous!

The fact is, the most tasteful and understated moment of the night was the one performance that did, in fact, specifically mention LGBT rights and the fact that they are human rights:

Clothes on. A focus more on pitch than on shock. A clear and direct message.

As a performance artist himself, Rush could probably learn from the above.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails