RECENT  POSTS:  » READ: Very anti-gay crew vows to never recognize civil marriage equality (even though they so will or face penalties) » NOM #March4Marriage coalition partner, religious liaison: 'Homosexuality is behavior and choice...immoral' » Mike Huckabee blatantly lies about something no civil marriage activist is seeking » Video: Man who once called for ban on gay teachers promotes #March4Marriage; because of course he does » FRC Senior Fellow: We are prepared to 'give our lives' to fight same-sex marriage (i.e. 'our eternal destruction') » Questions 'Face The Nation' should ask Tony Perkins (but likely won't, sadly) » Gorgeous clip from PFLAG Canada recognizes the many marriage memories that never were » On marriage, FRC prays SCOTUS will 'rule in the fear of the Lord' » AFA's new desperation: Marriage equality will turn bible into 'Mein Kampf' » Stop me if you've heard this one: Gay men throw reception for Ted Cruz; Cruz doesn't act as super anti-gay as usual  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/15/2013

New marriage definition: One man, one woman—constant eye contact during sex?!

by Jeremy Hooper

Screen Shot 2013-08-15 At 1.50.17 Pm An anti-gay politico in Mexico, Ana María Jiménez Ortiz, has determined that gay people should not get marriage because gay people do not face one another during sex:

"Marriage should only be considered as those relationships in which the members have sex facing each other, which does not occur between homosexual couples." (via Joe.My.God)

Without being vulgar, I must begin by noting that she's just plain wrong. As much as I love hearing gay sex described by people who claim to loathe it so, I think Ms. Ortiz might want to leave the expertise to those of us who are quite fond of the same-sex coitus.

But beyond that, what exactly does sex positioning have to do with marriage? I mean, I know these folks love putting a microscope on people's bedrooms, but I'm pretty sure that a vast majority of the world's population would be uncomfortable with an activist determining whether or not their bed game are missionary enough to qualify for a civil license.

And now let me end by abruptly shutting up and getting out of the way. After all, these outspoke foes of equality are really starting to be our best assets.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails