RECENT  POSTS:  » What to even say about Josh Duggar? » GOP prez candidates lining up for NOM-sponsored event in Iowa » Video: Ted Cruz tells viciously anti-gay Family Research Council he's got their back on anti-gay discrimination » Scouts prez seeks long overdue end to offensive stigma » FRC prays against Dan Savage 'spewing upon our nation'; I'll let Dan make that joke himself » Sen. (and prez candidate) Cruz to join extreme anti-LGBT activists at Family Research Council event (#WOTW15) » 'Out' magazine's editor-in-chief makes case against gay 'bullies'; it's shortsighted and here's why » Voodoo, snake oil, 'changing' gays: CA congressman to introduce national ban on dangerous anti-science » Because the internet exists, listen to former 'Love Connection' host Chuck Woolery rant about marriage equality » Today in least-you-can-do-ness: Billy Graham's son tweeting anti-equality prayers to SCOTUS justices  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/21/2013

NOM mad you didn't hear about this poll; so here, let's talk about it

by Jeremy Hooper

In truth, the Fox News poll asked the question in several different ways, and got several different responses. All of the responses show great momentum from the time Fox News first started asking the question; on the question of constitutionality, a healthy majority think gays have a constitutional right to marry:

201308211442
[FULL RESULTS: Fox News]

But as you surely know, it's a difficult time for the National Organization For Marriage, particularly when it comes to something like polling. So what do they do? Well, they just flat-out misrepresent the above results, of course:

Nom Email 2013-08-21 Fundraising HeaderAnd today news of a recent Fox News poll has come to light that is even better. Fox asked the question, Would you approve or disapprove of changing the definition of the word marriage to also include same-sex couples?

56% said they would disapprove, while only 39% would approve!

SOURCE: NOM

First off, even the figure NOM cites has changed considerably in the past decade. And even on this current question, the under 35 crowd answered in the affirmative (54%). Momentum is NOM's biggest adversary, and it's clearly on our side, even in this oddly worded question in a conservative news outlet's poll.

But beyond that—how friggin' nervy of NOM to accuse the media of ignoring this poll (from a media outlet, oddly enough) while at the same time overlooking the full data set! I mean, this very poll (taken before the SCOTUS rulings, I should note) shows a majority saying yes, gay people do in fact have a constitutional right to marry. I of course understand why NOM would want to ignore that point, as well as the demographic breakdowns and trajectory lines. But to ignore the data while also attacking the way people have reported this poll? That's egregious!

That's NOM.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails