RECENT  POSTS:  » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/13/2013

Does an agenda-driven, scientifically-rebuked movement that created its own in-flux status need civil rights?

by Jeremy Hooper

Claiming that the rebuking of their scientifically-repudiated clams constitutes some sort of civil rights violation, the "ex-gay" advocacy organization PFOX is posing this question to its readers:

Screen Shot 2013-09-13 At 11.32.35 Am
[READ: PFOX]

Click through to the link if we want to see their supporting evidence. It's exactly what you would think (e.g. noting the truths about the "ex-gay" movement is discrimination).

The truth, of course, is that "ex-gay"-identified people absolutely, 100%, in every way needs civil rights. And they have them. A self-identified "ex-gay" person has a sexuality, even if he or she chooses to instead identify in some politically-driven flux state. Like all human beings, those who part of the "ex-gay" movement are either protected from unjust discrimination on the basis of their actual or perceived sexual orientations, or they can step up and help us continue to achieve the needed gains in areas where the law is not yet up to snuff. They are in the same boat as everyone else.

But the other truth, of course, is that "ex-gay" people want us to accept the idea that their agenda-driven, scientifically-rebuked, condemnatory-faith-motivated insistence that being a "former homosexual" is some sort of class onto itself. It's ludicrous, frankly.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails