RECENT  POSTS:  » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


Does an agenda-driven, scientifically-rebuked movement that created its own in-flux status need civil rights?

by Jeremy Hooper

Claiming that the rebuking of their scientifically-repudiated clams constitutes some sort of civil rights violation, the "ex-gay" advocacy organization PFOX is posing this question to its readers:

Screen Shot 2013-09-13 At 11.32.35 Am

Click through to the link if we want to see their supporting evidence. It's exactly what you would think (e.g. noting the truths about the "ex-gay" movement is discrimination).

The truth, of course, is that "ex-gay"-identified people absolutely, 100%, in every way needs civil rights. And they have them. A self-identified "ex-gay" person has a sexuality, even if he or she chooses to instead identify in some politically-driven flux state. Like all human beings, those who part of the "ex-gay" movement are either protected from unjust discrimination on the basis of their actual or perceived sexual orientations, or they can step up and help us continue to achieve the needed gains in areas where the law is not yet up to snuff. They are in the same boat as everyone else.

But the other truth, of course, is that "ex-gay" people want us to accept the idea that their agenda-driven, scientifically-rebuked, condemnatory-faith-motivated insistence that being a "former homosexual" is some sort of class onto itself. It's ludicrous, frankly.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails