RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/24/2013

'Ex-gay' confuses proudly rejected books with 'banned' books

by Jeremy Hooper

Screen Shot 2013-09-24 At 8.55.33 AmEvery year, the American Library Association selects worthy books that have been unfairly banned and highlights the tomes as part of its "Banned Books Week." Increasingly prominent "ex-gay" activist Christopher Doyle says he knows some quality books that continue to get overlooked:

“There are homosexuals and the gay activists in [the American Library Association] that are actively anti-ex-gay and keeping us out of this list,” Doyle tells OneNewsNow.
Will Library Association include ex-gay titles for Banned Books Week? [ONN]

The problem, of course, is that Doyle wants these books to be shelved as nonfiction. I mean, if he were trying to highlight some masterful works of fiction about forms of therapy that could supposedly "cure" certain kinds of humans of their sexual orientations, that might be a compelling tale of fantasy. Sounds like a really strong subject for a sci-fi writer's dystopian exploration.

But what Doyle wants is for the American Library Association to recognize the nonfiction version of this scientifically unsupported story, and then take it a step further and claim that people who reject the "scholarly merits" of these kind of books are acting as unfair censors. He wants the ALA and those pesky gay activists sound like bullies who are silencing strong works, in hopes that his agenda-driven claims will somehow strengthen the worth of both these works of "ex-gay" nonfiction and his movement's "we're the victims!" strategy.

It's not working on anyone. A resoundingly rejected book is not a "banned" book.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails