RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/19/2013

FRC essentially lied in court

by Jeremy Hooper

At the sentencing of the man behind that awful, despicable, scary, resoundingly denounced incident of gunplay that played out at the Family Research Council's headquarters in the summer of 2012, FRC president Tony Perkins read a statement in front of a District Court judge. Here is some of what said about the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks discriminatory groups:

Screen Shot 2013-09-19 At 6.55.21 Pm

This is a lie. A number of groups carry a "protect marriage" and are not at all a part of the SPLC's monitoring. Even longtime "protect marriage" stalwarts like Focus on the Family and explicitly marriage-focused orgs like NOM are off the SPLC's list. It's not just man/woman marriage advocacy that earns the distinction.

The SPLC has a set of criteria for determining which groups pass over the high bar and make it onto the active anti-gay list. One need only look at Tony Perkins, Peter Sprigg, or Kenyn Cureton's rhetoric to understand why FRC earned heightened scrutiny (operative word being "earned"). And FRC knows this, too. Or at least the FRC staffers should know it because SPLC has made it perfectly clear. FRC just knows that playing the victim is a good fundraising tool, so they are using even horrible incidents like this one to score points against their political opponents rather than to self-reflect and do what they should do: take responsibility for their own work.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails