RECENT  POSTS:  » Wall Street's biggest put stock in equal bonds » Gross: Tony Perkins makes some sort of 'ugly baby' joke at Hillary Clinton's expense » Really, suddenly contrite Ben Carson? Because you were pretty cocksure before! » ADF links A-Rod's drug suspension with florist's anti-gay discrimination; huh?! » NOM: Marriage means putting choking hazards on your baby's toes » Video: Ben Carson is apparently one felony conviction away from fellating a man » NOM to gay families: Your relationships are 'simply about adult sexual desires' » Maggie Gallagher's new gig » How do you even talk with a movement that insists we 'cannot coexist'? » Sen. Manchin picks odd way to (D-istinguish) himself  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/23/2013

National Organization for [Banning Divorce]

by Jeremy Hooper

If the first two lines form a position that they think can and must be inscribed into civil policy, why should we expect this special interest group to stop there?

Screen Shot 2013-09-23 At 9.23.12 Am
[NOM's Facebook]

I mean, personally I would do okay in that "ONE TIME" world, since I'm more than confident that my amazing husband and I will stay in our rock-solid bond for life. But neither my life's reality nor my personal opinions form a basis off which I'd ever set shared public policy. That is what NOM does not understand!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails