RECENT  POSTS:  » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house » AL Chief Justice Roy Moore calls marriage equality worse than segregation decision » And by opposition 'from all sides,' FRC means exclusively from the (R) side » Video: What it looked like when that thing happened today » Hillary vows to keep fighting for full LGBT equality; et tu, GOP rivals?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/23/2013

National Organization for [Banning Divorce]

by Jeremy Hooper

If the first two lines form a position that they think can and must be inscribed into civil policy, why should we expect this special interest group to stop there?

Screen Shot 2013-09-23 At 9.23.12 Am
[NOM's Facebook]

I mean, personally I would do okay in that "ONE TIME" world, since I'm more than confident that my amazing husband and I will stay in our rock-solid bond for life. But neither my life's reality nor my personal opinions form a basis off which I'd ever set shared public policy. That is what NOM does not understand!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails