RECENT  POSTS:  » Your anti-LGBT movement at work: Viciously denigrating stock photos of gay families » Maggie Gallagher's latest shows what a disservice she did to the *civil* marriage debate » Brian Brown apparently buying a new dinette set, misapplies purchase to marriage debate » Focus on the Family: Marriage equality activists are 'tyrants'; opponents are 'slaves' » Read: Zack Ford smacks back Ryan Anderson's love of tax-subsidized discrimination » God Hates Fads: Radical Bay State group pretends homosexuality is like skinny jeans » But does the Archbishop even believe in gay? » Video: Move over aliens, plagues, Sharknados—it's committed gays who'll soon kill Western Civilization » Nine former water-carriers for 'ex-gayness' join all credible scientists in denouncing 'ex-gay' propaganda » The operative word is 'yet'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/23/2013

National Organization for [Banning Divorce]

by Jeremy Hooper

If the first two lines form a position that they think can and must be inscribed into civil policy, why should we expect this special interest group to stop there?

Screen Shot 2013-09-23 At 9.23.12 Am
[NOM's Facebook]

I mean, personally I would do okay in that "ONE TIME" world, since I'm more than confident that my amazing husband and I will stay in our rock-solid bond for life. But neither my life's reality nor my personal opinions form a basis off which I'd ever set shared public policy. That is what NOM does not understand!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails