RECENT  POSTS:  » I'm pretty sure Maggie Gallagher just called the National Org. For Marriage ineffective » 379 companies that want their logos paired with uplifting music in inevitable marriage (in)equality documentaries » NOM affiliate group to give Roy Moore a 'Letter from Birmingham Jail Award' » Save the Date: SCOTUS to hear history-making marriage cases on April 28 » Wall Street's biggest put stock in equal bonds » Gross: Tony Perkins makes some sort of 'ugly baby' joke at Hillary Clinton's expense » Really, suddenly contrite Ben Carson? Because you were pretty cocksure before! » ADF links A-Rod's drug suspension with florist's anti-gay discrimination; huh?! » NOM: Marriage means putting choking hazards on your baby's toes » Video: Ben Carson is apparently one felony conviction away from fellating a man  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/10/2013

NOM owns its illegal-in-all-fifty-states mission

by Jeremy Hooper

At this point, what more can we say about the cake bakers who wanted to turn away a gay couple rather than comply with nondiscrimination law, and who then chose to close what had apparently become an unprofitable business? That conversation is well worn, and we on the side of basic fairness are winning it.

Instead, I want to applaud the National Organization For Marriage for using the word "illegal" when referring to the current status of same-sex marriage in Oregon:

Screen Shot 2013-09-10 At 11.20.01 Am
[NOM]

For its first handful of years, NOM never used the word "illegal" because they know that it's a loaded worded that puts the burden on their desire to discriminate. But let's be clear: Our illegality is what the NOM agenda truly seeks, both at the state and the federal level. If left to its own devices, NOM would dismantle marriages like mine and then make it downright criminal for anyone to try to reinstate it. That is not an overstatement—it is what they want to do!

I, for one, am very glad to see NOM embracing reality. As they continue on their quest to retain gay couples' illegality in certain states and create new illegalities in other states (and federally), I expect NOM to keep up the candor!

**But this all said, the bakery situation still deals with the NONDISCRIMINATION LAW (which is perfectly legal), not the local legality of same-sex marriage.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails