RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/10/2013

NOM owns its illegal-in-all-fifty-states mission

by Jeremy Hooper

At this point, what more can we say about the cake bakers who wanted to turn away a gay couple rather than comply with nondiscrimination law, and who then chose to close what had apparently become an unprofitable business? That conversation is well worn, and we on the side of basic fairness are winning it.

Instead, I want to applaud the National Organization For Marriage for using the word "illegal" when referring to the current status of same-sex marriage in Oregon:

Screen Shot 2013-09-10 At 11.20.01 Am
[NOM]

For its first handful of years, NOM never used the word "illegal" because they know that it's a loaded worded that puts the burden on their desire to discriminate. But let's be clear: Our illegality is what the NOM agenda truly seeks, both at the state and the federal level. If left to its own devices, NOM would dismantle marriages like mine and then make it downright criminal for anyone to try to reinstate it. That is not an overstatement—it is what they want to do!

I, for one, am very glad to see NOM embracing reality. As they continue on their quest to retain gay couples' illegality in certain states and create new illegalities in other states (and federally), I expect NOM to keep up the candor!

**But this all said, the bakery situation still deals with the NONDISCRIMINATION LAW (which is perfectly legal), not the local legality of same-sex marriage.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails