RECENT  POSTS:  » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out » But your subjective view of 'real' marriage is factually irrelevant, Ryan » Flip Benham (yes, their dad) reportedly protesting outside NC weddings » TV's Duggar family continues anti-LGBT activism » Caught ya: Far-right's latest marriage 'victim' edited website to make more solid legal case » Read: Wyoming to become our 32nd marriage equality state » GLAAD: Victory is what happens while you're busy making other plans » What fake victimization sounds like in Arizona » Federal judge strikes Arizona's discriminatory marriage ban; marriages should begin today! » NOM's latest desperation: Relying on hearsay James O'Keefe video to smear Democrat for 'secretly' not opposing equality  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/17/2013

Oregon gays get legally-binding (*destination) weddings

by Jeremy Hooper

Our inevitable victory is a patchwork, not an avalanche. Here's another piece:

OREGON: State Orders Agencies To Recognize Out-Of-State Gay Marriages [J.M.G.]

For Oregon gays, this means the ability to go get married in another state (like nearby Washington or California) and then return home to full recognition, but for Oregon state's coffers, it means exporting all of the joy and commerce associated with the weddings. What kind of sense is there in that?

Answer: no sense at all. Oregon will go the distance very soon. As will every state.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails