RECENT  POSTS:  » Wall Street's biggest put stock in equal bonds » Gross: Tony Perkins makes some sort of 'ugly baby' joke at Hillary Clinton's expense » Really, suddenly contrite Ben Carson? Because you were pretty cocksure before! » ADF links A-Rod's drug suspension with florist's anti-gay discrimination; huh?! » NOM: Marriage means putting choking hazards on your baby's toes » Video: Ben Carson is apparently one felony conviction away from fellating a man » NOM to gay families: Your relationships are 'simply about adult sexual desires' » Maggie Gallagher's new gig » How do you even talk with a movement that insists we 'cannot coexist'? » Sen. Manchin picks odd way to (D-istinguish) himself  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/17/2013

Oregon gays get legally-binding (*destination) weddings

by Jeremy Hooper

Our inevitable victory is a patchwork, not an avalanche. Here's another piece:

OREGON: State Orders Agencies To Recognize Out-Of-State Gay Marriages [J.M.G.]

For Oregon gays, this means the ability to go get married in another state (like nearby Washington or California) and then return home to full recognition, but for Oregon state's coffers, it means exporting all of the joy and commerce associated with the weddings. What kind of sense is there in that?

Answer: no sense at all. Oregon will go the distance very soon. As will every state.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails