RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Man who's directly compared homosexuality to pedophilia will now lecture you on extremism » The 'why can't they take their business elsewhere?' line: Not only offensive but legally meaningless » FRC's ridiculously bunk new poll (*from partisan polling firm) » Video: 'Vice' covers the sad, dangerous, discredited world of 'conversion therapy' » Buzzfeed: Jeb Bush's nascent team is teeming with gay Republicans » FRC prays against gay acceptance to 'avoid the wrath of God' » Video: Mark Cuban supports religious biz owners that 'just say no' to serving same-sex weddings » We're not driven by animus, say groups that are known for showing animus toward gay couples » Video: Onetime LGBT community foe delivers crushing blow to 'religious freedom' (a.k.a. license to discriminate) bills » Q. How does Mark Regnerus 'prove' he's not an anti-gay activist?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/09/2013

Smug, glib, discriminatory: Gov. Christie continues offensive disregard for civil equality

by Jeremy Hooper

Screen Shot 2013-10-09 At 10.43.18 Am A Republican governor of a blue state continues to show arrogant disregard for civil rights and their handling:

"Okay, so you put it on the ballot — you vote your way, I vote my way. And whoever gets the most votes wins."

—New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, speaking to a pro-equality new Jersey voter on the subject of marriage equality and his insistence that same-sex couples' marriages must pass popularity contest

So unbelievably offensive.

Let's vote on your marriage, governor. Then if we get the most votes, you explain to your children that mommy and daddy can no longer be married because certain people, working largely from faith motivations, have determined that your taxes do not entitle you to full participation. "So be it," the rest of us will glibly exclaim, as if your civil marriage rights are some sort of student council election that young Bobby lost and should just get over.

The thing is, marriage equality most likely would pass in New Jersey. That's not the point! Even if I knew for a fact that marriage equality would win by a 99% margin, I would still say that voting on a minority population's ciivl rights is wrong. Because it's wrong.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails