RECENT  POSTS:  » Pro-discrimination activists continue to use one woman's one-sided spite against ex-husband to attack marriage equality » Audio: Tony Perkins minimizes actual religious persecution; pretends he and anti-gay pals face 'deadly consequences' » Ryan Anderson, Mark Regnerus, Rick Warren, other inequality advocates urge Pope to 'commit to marriage' » GLAAD: Are some anti-LGBT activists missing a self-awareness gene? » FRC faults Dems for broken, obstructionist Congress while advocating for broken, obstructionist Congress » FRC senior staffer: 'Ex-Gays: The Best Kept Secret in Your Child’s School' » Video: In inclusive ad, AZ Sec. of State hopeful makes discrimination his rival » That discriminatory OR baker is really overthinking reason why she's national news » Robert Oscar Lopez confirms belief that gay parents are like slave owners » Video: Values Voter Summit marriage panel was particularly boring, bad, ineffective this year  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/21/2013

Indiana GOP gearing up to stain state's history, lose future elections

by Jeremy Hooper

While open to possibly taking out language that also bans civil unions, Republicans in the Indiana legislature are vowing to further connect their party to the wrong side of the marriage issue:

Despite calls from Democrat legislative leaders to shelve the divisive constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, top Republicans said Tuesday the legislature should work its will on the proposal — and possibly tweak it.
KEEP READING: GOP ponders tweak in same-sex marriage ban [Indy Star]

Passing a marriage ban was always wrong, even back when doing so was about as easy as passing a resolution declaring pizza to be tasty. But now, after sixteen states, historic Supreme Court rulings, consistent (and always rising) majoring approval in all credible polling, a president who was re-elected on a pro-equality ticket, same-sex marriages on TV's top sitcoms, and a tide of history that is so inevitably on the side of full marriage equality, it is downright dangerous for the GOP to take this on.

Yes, this is true even in red states where such an amendment might have a fighting chance at passage. In every state, there is an enthusiastic crowd of equality supporters looking to push back against those who take away human rights. Ability to achieve a bare majority doesn't absolve you from the considerable backlash that will come with fostering such cruel divisiveness. And it will come.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails