RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/21/2013

Indiana GOP gearing up to stain state's history, lose future elections

by Jeremy Hooper

While open to possibly taking out language that also bans civil unions, Republicans in the Indiana legislature are vowing to further connect their party to the wrong side of the marriage issue:

Despite calls from Democrat legislative leaders to shelve the divisive constitutional ban on same-sex marriage, top Republicans said Tuesday the legislature should work its will on the proposal — and possibly tweak it.
KEEP READING: GOP ponders tweak in same-sex marriage ban [Indy Star]

Passing a marriage ban was always wrong, even back when doing so was about as easy as passing a resolution declaring pizza to be tasty. But now, after sixteen states, historic Supreme Court rulings, consistent (and always rising) majoring approval in all credible polling, a president who was re-elected on a pro-equality ticket, same-sex marriages on TV's top sitcoms, and a tide of history that is so inevitably on the side of full marriage equality, it is downright dangerous for the GOP to take this on.

Yes, this is true even in red states where such an amendment might have a fighting chance at passage. In every state, there is an enthusiastic crowd of equality supporters looking to push back against those who take away human rights. Ability to achieve a bare majority doesn't absolve you from the considerable backlash that will come with fostering such cruel divisiveness. And it will come.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails