RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/14/2013

'Privacy For All Students' goes another round with me; 'we don't want Sacramento legislating tolerance of damaging lifestyles'

by Jeremy Hooper

In response to my piece for GLAAD pointing out that the Privacy For All Students coalition has put forth no path for protecting the transgender students they would leave vulnerable, should their repeal effort go forward, this anti-trans coalition offered me yet another public reply. Here it is, followed by my reaction:

Screen Shot 2013-11-14 At 1.43.01 Pm
Screen Shot 2013-11-14 At 1.43.08 Pm
[Facebook]

"Damaging lifestyles." There it is. There's that animus that we all knew was there. Thanks, kids.

And now, true to anti-LGBT form, they have deleted my comments and banned me with this "explanation":

Screen Shot 2013-11-14 At 1.48.52 Pm

So much for the fair and free exchange of ideas. Typical.

Oh, but I actually am a parent, PFAS. And I know your movement better than you know yourselves, which is why my words are a threat to you all.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails