RECENT  POSTS:  » Southern Baptist's ERLC dedicating national conference to gay people, discrimination; better luck next year, homeless » Photo: NOM thinks its discriminatory cause is young and hip; adorable » An inside look at POTUS's evolution circa 2011–2012 » More animus from Texas' key 'protect marriage' guy » GLAAD: Why would we silence unwittingly helpful voices like yours, Peter LaBarbera? » Photo: NOM fully (and finally) owning its wholly faith-driven root » Our winning movement wins another one: Judge says Ohio must recognize out-of-state marriages » Video: Tony Perkins is pissssssssssssed at Chick-fil-a » You must be so proud of this headline, @ChristianPost » READ: Full page 'NY Times' ad pleas to supposedly refreshing new Pope: Take strong stand for LGBT youth  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/14/2013

'Privacy For All Students' goes another round with me; 'we don't want Sacramento legislating tolerance of damaging lifestyles'

by Jeremy Hooper

In response to my piece for GLAAD pointing out that the Privacy For All Students coalition has put forth no path for protecting the transgender students they would leave vulnerable, should their repeal effort go forward, this anti-trans coalition offered me yet another public reply. Here it is, followed by my reaction:

Screen Shot 2013-11-14 At 1.43.01 Pm
Screen Shot 2013-11-14 At 1.43.08 Pm
[Facebook]

"Damaging lifestyles." There it is. There's that animus that we all knew was there. Thanks, kids.

And now, true to anti-LGBT form, they have deleted my comments and banned me with this "explanation":

Screen Shot 2013-11-14 At 1.48.52 Pm

So much for the fair and free exchange of ideas. Typical.

Oh, but I actually am a parent, PFAS. And I know your movement better than you know yourselves, which is why my words are a threat to you all.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails