RECENT  POSTS:  » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open » Video: 'Ex-gay' speaker at upcoming ERLC summit equates talking to gay people with talking to cancer patients » GLAAD: Mainstream media is catching on to NOM's broader agenda » FRC's Values Voter Summit puts anti-gay bakers on a marriage panel; so we won, basically » GOP front group NOM raising money for a GOP US Senate  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/06/2013

What's the implication here, Dirty Mind Research Council?

by Jeremy Hooper

Check out the Family Research Council's latest headline decrying The Employment NonDiscrimination Act (ENDA):

Screen Shot 2013-11-06 At 5.14.37 Am
[FRC]

"Up clothes"? What is it, exactly, that they think ENDA does: force second base on unsuspecting Americans?

Perhaps they think it's "in 'da", like "in 'da bra" or "in 'da shorts"? Maybe they think seven Republicans and fifty-four Democratic U.S. Senators just cleared a legislative hurdle so that they can direct the NSA to spy on Americans' private parts?

You really have to wonder what they're saying here. Other than "you should dislike LGBT people," I mean.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails