RECENT  POSTS:  » The anti-gay right is really testing the limits of America's bullsh*t meter » Breaking: Arkansas's Republican governor won't sign license-to-discriminate bill in its current form » AFA goes after Megyn Kelly for suggesting Indiana protect gays and lesbians from discrimination » Hillary Clinton comes out against Arkansas license-to-disriminate bill!! » #RFRA and a movement that shirks responsibility (almost) as much as it shirks equality » Audio: Limbaugh admits #RFRA fight is about same-sex marriage; links homosexuality to bestiality » Sen Schumer, federal #RFRA coauthor, knocks down lie that Indiana's version is the same » Video: I can't fathom invoking concentration camps in my political discourse. But Glenn Beck on the other hand... » Get a load of this double-talk from the Family Research Council #RFRA #Indiana » NOM admits 'religious freedom' bills are about discriminating against same-sex couples; thanks, NOM  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/22/2014

Audio: And by 'essentially the same thing,' Tony Perkins means 'not even close.'

by Jeremy Hooper

After running down the supposed tales of woe involving the three or four cake bakers and photographers who were told that they must comply with fairly enacted nondiscrimination law, Family Research Council president Tony Perkins tries to use this scenario as a "gotcha" against people on our side:

SOURCE: Washington Watch Live, 1/21/14

The same thing? Riiiiight, Tony. Except not. At all. In any way.

Patrons of a gay bar are customers. They are people from all walks of life who are paying the bar for a service. They are hanging out and enjoying their American freedoms of assembly, beer, and drag shows.

Businesses that put up a shingle and purport to do business with the public are binding themselves to the laws of the state where they set up shop. When they choose to go into business, they all know this (or at least should). If they don't want to comply with the laws, then they must find another way to do their craft that does not run afoul of these policies. There are ways.

To drag a customer out of a bar and demand that they attend a church (which they may or may not already do anyway) is, in fact, a gross violation of freedoms and a obviously unfair imposition of religion. Telling a business owner that he or she must not discriminate against customers is neither. Both instances, the factual attempt to wiggle out of nondiscrimination laws by citing religion and the theoretical idea of wrangling people out of a bar in order to promote religion, are situations involving Christians overstepping their bounds and demanding entitlements.

The proper analogy would if a gay bar wanted to deny a Christian customer bar service. In that case, Tony would actually have a point, as religion, like sexual orientation, is a protected class in most state nondiscrimination laws. But the case, as the reliably hostile FRC president states it, only shows (a) how fully he misunderstands what's going on and (b) just how excessive his evangelical superiority complex truly is.

Pagebreak-366

**By the way, bakery owner Aaron Klein has admitted that he simply doesn't want gay people to be seen as normal. In fact, he feels so strongly about this, that he wouldn't even let his kid see the Bully movie: Oh the irony: Anti-gay bakery owner attacked 'Bully' movie; gay acceptance is 'a LIE,' 'communist mind set' [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails