RECENT  POSTS:  » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


Bipartisan, (R)yan?

by Jeremy Hooper

HR 3829, the silly named “State Marriage Defense Act of 2014,” has one Republican sponsor and 27 GOP co-sponsors. It is yet another attempt by House Republicans to waste time on go-nowhere bills rather than do the work of the people.

But in the anti-equality spin machine, this 100% GOP bill is somehow "bipartisan." Heritage Foundation's Ryan T. Anderson recently wrote/tweeted:

Screen Shot 2014-01-13 At 5.32.37 Pm
[Ryan T. Anderson]

He meant by-a-partisan, perhaps?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails