RECENT  POSTS:  » What most people aren't getting about the fake non-troversies of the anti-gay right » 'Weekly Standard' asst. editor equates Tim Cook with man who pits God against him » Michigan pastors make unfortunate lifestyle choice; say they'll go to jail rather than not discriminate » PFOX's Quinlan says SBC leader's opposition to 'reparative therapy' is cruel » That Idaho wedding venue posts new 'rules and regulations'; will still perform non-Christian weddings » Another deceptive thing about NOM's duplicitous anti-Hagan ad » NOM trying to shape Arkansas politics without even learning state's abbreviation » Video: Focus on the Family staffer who calls homosexuality 'particularly evil lie of Satan' hangs out in Chicago's Boystown » Video: Another new NOM ad targets Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR); uses James O'Keefe video as source » What the heck is 'NOM Victory Fund'?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/13/2014

Bipartisan, (R)yan?

by Jeremy Hooper

HR 3829, the silly named “State Marriage Defense Act of 2014,” has one Republican sponsor and 27 GOP co-sponsors. It is yet another attempt by House Republicans to waste time on go-nowhere bills rather than do the work of the people.

But in the anti-equality spin machine, this 100% GOP bill is somehow "bipartisan." Heritage Foundation's Ryan T. Anderson recently wrote/tweeted:

Screen Shot 2014-01-13 At 5.32.37 Pm
[Ryan T. Anderson]

He meant by-a-partisan, perhaps?

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails