RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/07/2014

Bob Vander Plaats' Utah statement doesn't even make sense

by Jeremy Hooper

The man who has failed oh so many times to stop marriage equality in his home state of Iowa is today turning his attention to Utah. This is Bob Vander Plaats' take on the stay that has put the marriage equality on pause while the 10th Circuit considers the case:

The FAMiLY LEADER and I applaud the leadership of Utah’s Governor for challenging an activist judge’s opinion to usurp the will of the people regarding God’s design for family with the union of one man/one woman marriage,” said Bob Vander Plaats, President and CEO of The FAMiLY LEADER. “People understand that courts and judges don’t get to make law, don’t have the power to execute law nor do they have the privilege of amending our constitution. The power belongs to ‘we the people’ not ‘we the courts.’” [TFL]

Um, Bob—it was a court that made the decision to stay. And it will be a court that makes the next determination about equality in the region. You can't both applaud this judicial move and decry the judicial process!

Look, Mr. VP, I know you're sore that you, after almost five years of trying, haven't been able to convince your locals that the minority civil rights that have caused no disruption to your state should be put before a public popularity contest. I get it. You're mad at courts because it was a unanimous court decision that bestowed the freedom to marry onto the great state of Iowa. But let's at least try for something resembling consistency. A stay is not a win for you or a loss for us, but it's absolutely a judicial determination to which we are both bound.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails