RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/02/2014

Deceptively named 'Privacy for All Students' continues hobby of deceptive naming

by Jeremy Hooper

With it looking increasingly likely that the new law designed to safeguard the transgender public school student's day-to-day education will go in effect despite their attempts to derail, California's anti-trans coalition is working overtime to misrepresent the new measure and its intent. Check out the part I put in bold:

Co-ed Bathroom Bill Update: Legislature Still Has To Hold It
12/30/2013

Sacramento, CA--A referendum has put on hold a 37 word bill which would have opened up restrooms, locker rooms and showers in K-12 public schools to students “irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil’s records.”
Known as the Co-ed Bathroom Bill, Assembly Bill 1266 originally was due to go into effect on Jan. 1, 2014. But voters in all 58 of California’s counties have put on the brakes by submitting more than 600,000 signatures to the Secretary of State.
KEEP READING: Pacific Justice Insitute

"Know as the Co-Ed Bathroom Bill"? Um, no, No, no, no, no, no!

The law the legislature passed and the governor signed is, in fact, called and known as the School Success and Opportunity Act. The opponents cannot just give it a new name befitting their agenda and insist that it's an alternate title. That very well might be what they call it at their pity parties or even what they want Californians to start calling the measure, but they don't have the power to grant "known as" status just because they know the pseudonym would help them scare folks into supporting their discriminatory cause.

But deception is, of course, the order of the day on the other side. After all, this is the same crew that insists its movement should be known as "pro-family" when even a kindergartener can recognize that they are really anti-LGBT.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails