RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/30/2014

Indiana marriage equality opponents essentially admitting that tide is turning against them

by Jeremy Hooper

Ever since the Indiana house stripped away language from that state's proposed marriage amendment, a move that will likely push any potential vote on the matter back to at least the year 2016, the state's supporters of discrimination have been saying some interesting things about the ban and its chances. Namely, they've been all but admitting that two years of change will pretty much kill any hope they had to pass the ignoble measure.

The is the gist, courtesy of the Indiana Family Institute

Screen Shot 2014-01-30 At 2.15.12 Pm
[HoosierFamily]

"...will have killed the marriage amendment....probably for good." Translation: We know that polls are moving at a rapid pace, and it's likely that by the year 2016, the idea of a marriage ban will be even more of a nonstarter than it is right now.

There is no other way to interpret it. If the opponents were simply bemoaning the setback, that would be one thing. That is not what they are doing. In a clear voice, the opposition groups at both the local and national level are voicing some variation of the above. They are warning their supporters that it's now or never, and they are telling them this because they know, as well as we do, that two years in the marriage equality movement means two more years of poll-able voters turning eighteen. They see the writing on the wall as much as we do.

That's why I think they should just stop. Now's good.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails