RECENT  POSTS:  » 'Indianapolis Star' to Governor Pence: FIX THIS NOW » Bill Maher's monologue on dialogue he'd prefer remain a monologue » Video: Even Michael Steele thinks Indiana law is too broad; Ryan T. Anderson constantly interrupts, still loses » Watch Gov. Pence heap praise on lobbying group that admitted #SB101 was all about same-sex marriage » Shellshocked Gov. Pence in full-blown spin mode » Video: Man who's called for exporting gays goes on CNN to defend Indiana law, earns deserved result » Man who insinuated it's better to be thrown into sea than support homosexuality attended #SB101 signing ceremony » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/30/2014

Indiana marriage equality opponents essentially admitting that tide is turning against them

by Jeremy Hooper

Ever since the Indiana house stripped away language from that state's proposed marriage amendment, a move that will likely push any potential vote on the matter back to at least the year 2016, the state's supporters of discrimination have been saying some interesting things about the ban and its chances. Namely, they've been all but admitting that two years of change will pretty much kill any hope they had to pass the ignoble measure.

The is the gist, courtesy of the Indiana Family Institute

Screen Shot 2014-01-30 At 2.15.12 Pm
[HoosierFamily]

"...will have killed the marriage amendment....probably for good." Translation: We know that polls are moving at a rapid pace, and it's likely that by the year 2016, the idea of a marriage ban will be even more of a nonstarter than it is right now.

There is no other way to interpret it. If the opponents were simply bemoaning the setback, that would be one thing. That is not what they are doing. In a clear voice, the opposition groups at both the local and national level are voicing some variation of the above. They are warning their supporters that it's now or never, and they are telling them this because they know, as well as we do, that two years in the marriage equality movement means two more years of poll-able voters turning eighteen. They see the writing on the wall as much as we do.

That's why I think they should just stop. Now's good.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails