RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: TLC to air show about humans' ability to suppress truth in name of religion » AFA, LaBarbera think being publicly pro-gay is still a liability; how quaint » Video: Blended family with lesbian moms heads Tylenol holiday ad » NOM's new conspiracy theory: Census Bureau making changes to hide marriage equality's ill effects » Video: Voices from our pro-equality future (present?) » Anti-gay orgs continue to offend children of single parents, gay parents, more » Apple CEO gives 'substantial' sum to HRC's southern state project; may or may not have used ApplePay » Conservative proposes new way for vendors to tell gay customers they don't care for them » NOM versus David Koch » Anti-equality baseball player calls reporter 'a prick' for asking about his anti-equality advocacy  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/06/2014

Melissa Harris-Perry to Indiana's GOP House Speaker: Don't lose the future

by Jeremy Hooper

In a nation of unabated progress, the Hoosier State is considering passing a regressive and deeply offensive same-sex marriage ban. An MSNBC host takes exception:

It's an interesting time for a politician concerned about his or her legacy. While all support for these kinds of marriage bans is unfortunate, the history books will likely allow a bit of cover for those figures, (D) or (R), who supported these bans back in the early part of the century. When the equality was more elusive, the ability and/or willingness to succumb to the anti-gay movement's misinformation campaigns was a bit more "understandable." Even if through rolled eyes, folks can more fully see how these early day holdouts wanted to "evolve" alongside the polling.

But now, with eighteen states (+DC) with marriage equality and the federal Defense of Marriage Act (so-called) a fading memory, no one has any excuse. Equality is around us, all around us for public consumption. A state lawmaker who turns a blind eye to the benignly peaceful marriages and instead gets behind the far-right fear rhetoric is making a choice to thumb his or her nose at concrete, tangible information (not to mention obvious polling trends) in favor of wanton bias. I suspect the history books will be much less kind to these discriminators-come-lately.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails