RECENT  POSTS:  » Man who insinuated it's better to be thrown into sea than support homosexuality attended #SB101 signing ceremony » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/30/2014

SD state senator wants to narrow gay people's rights; is the victim, natch

by Jeremy Hooper

Ernie Otten, a first term Republican state senator in South Dakota, has introduced legislation that would allow local businesses to discriminate against customers who wish to make purchases that somehow acknowledge their same-sex wedding or related ceremony. His proposal is a targeted attack that basically allows vendors to install a "no heterosexuality, no service" sign in their shop windows. It's a truly noxious concept that is not only disturbing on its face but that would also set a virulent precedent in terms of nondiscriminatory business practices, who must follow them, and when.

But you guys, Mr. Otten is the victim. Duh!

The GOP lawmaker tells the American Family Association's One News Now:

"There are radical activists out there that are always after us," says Otten, who says he learned that some of them plan to "take a run" at the South Dakota constitution. The state constitution says marriage is between a man and a woman. [ONN]

Always after him. He's wasting legislative time on a bill that seeks special carve outs that tell local LGBT people that they are second class citizens whose rights and protections (and, by extension, lives and loves) are meant to be undermined, but yet he is the one who lives in fear. Riiiiight.

But of course I'm in no way surprised to hear a local conservative working this "but I'm the victim" meme, since it's the one that the national conservative movement has so insistently, militantly, and anti-intellectually forced onto this debate. They are making an all-out, fifty state, targeted push to make our fellow citizens see us as aggressive, overreaching, overly entitled tyrants who deserve to be put in our place. It's become so commonplace that it's easy to kind of roll your eyes and dismiss their obviously desperate strategizing for what we know it to be. But when you really stop and think about the endgame that they're working toward (i.e. a population that turns on a certain minority for simply believing we are equal), it's actually quite chilling.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails