RECENT  POSTS:  » What most people aren't getting about the fake non-troversies of the anti-gay right » 'Weekly Standard' asst. editor equates Tim Cook with man who pits God against him » Michigan pastors make unfortunate lifestyle choice; say they'll go to jail rather than not discriminate » PFOX's Quinlan says SBC leader's opposition to 'reparative therapy' is cruel » That Idaho wedding venue posts new 'rules and regulations'; will still perform non-Christian weddings » Another deceptive thing about NOM's duplicitous anti-Hagan ad » NOM trying to shape Arkansas politics without even learning state's abbreviation » Video: Focus on the Family staffer who calls homosexuality 'particularly evil lie of Satan' hangs out in Chicago's Boystown » Video: Another new NOM ad targets Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR); uses James O'Keefe video as source » What the heck is 'NOM Victory Fund'?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/07/2014

That guy who starved himself (and who'd still be if he were consistent) admits fast's ulterior motives

by Jeremy Hooper

Trestin Meacham claimed that his fast was to force his state of Utah to use the repeatedly rejected theory of nullification to stop marriage equality. Yet when the Supreme Court temporarily stayed marriages while the 10th Circuit considers the matter, Mr. Meacham was quick to run to the nearest sandwich, even though his supposed goal was not even close to met.

But as suspected, Mr. Meacham's intent always ran deeper. He wrote on Twitter:

Screen Shot 2014-01-07 At 7.01.37 Am
[Trestin Meacham]

"Hated" [sic]? Really, Trestin? Because from my vantage point, I saw a lot of eye rolling, head shaking, and eagerness-to-promote-a-story-that-makes-the-equality-movement-look-ten-times-more-grounded-by-comparison. Not as much "hate" (*including in the comments following the above tweet)

I long for the days when the the anti-equality folks held martyrdom as only their third or fourth goal, at most. Nowadays, the "victimhood" is increasingly the driver. It's kind of like a twist on the modern day principle of "famous for being famous." Whereas young folks once strove to be singers or actors or leaders, with the fame a possible side effect, many now strive to be famous first, with the path toward getting there of much less importance. So too these "pro-family" warriors, who want to be rally points much more than they want to be public thinkers judged on their merits.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails