RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead) » Full trailer: 'The Normal Heart' » Vintage Clinton era oppo memo perhaps even more relevant today » Concerned Women For America advises churches to lockdown exclusionary marriage views » Video: What does conservative columnist Cal Thomas see as America's biggest threat? Take a guess. » Correcting NOM's fallacious fear graphic » Gee, Bryan, can't understand why federal courts are rejecting you gay = incest view » Former NOM sr. associate admits shift: Moving away from intellectual arguments, focusing on spiritual » Prop 8 defense attorney now planning lesbian daughter's wedding » If you can't afford your event, NOM, perhaps you should just cancel  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/23/2014

Today in people just doing their job: Virginia AG won't defend obviously unconstitutional state marriage ban

by Jeremy Hooper

These days, it seems like every minor "win" for the anti-equality side is immediately and resoundingly clobbered by a strong move from the right side of history. When North Carolina passed a marriage ban, President Obama came out and supported marriage. When a TV star makes horrible comments about gay people, a much bigger TV star comes out as gay.

And when an Indiana House committee advances a discriminatory marriage ban? Well, an Attorney General of a purple state reminds that committee, and the nation, that all marriage bans will someday face and fail a high court's scrutiny:

Screen Shot 2014-01-23 At 9.34.20 Am


Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring, who won election in November by a 0.04% margin, will join Prop 8 victors Ted Olson and David Boies in their bid to strike down his state's ban on gay marriage.
VIRGINIA: State Attorney General To Join Olson & Boies In Marriage Ban Lawsuit [J.M.G.]

Now, of course the anti-gay side will be all like, "he's neglecting his duty. Unfair! Unfair!" But that's because they hate the fact that laws like marriage bans are held to a higher standard then whatever they claim in their artfully spun press releases. They have to rage when people who are actually trained in the law note obvious realities about the law and its application, as theirs is a movement that only exists when the B.S. they call bias is voted on "by us." When it is put before court scrutiny, it fails every time.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails