RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/17/2014

Video: Michael Brown (again) claims #GLAADCAP is 'censoring'; is (again) bearing false witness

by Jeremy Hooper

GLAAD's Commentator Accountability Project, which I was involved in conceiving from its very first second of life (in GLAAD's conference room back in the summer of 2011, for the record), consists of nothing more than certain anti-LGBT people's own words. There is no editorializing or commentary—it's simply a sourced roundup of some of the top anti-LGBT activists' own rhetoric.

When it comes to public engagement, the project does not ask networks to stop booking the people on GLAAD CAP: we simply ask that if and when the networks see a need to book these individuals, they hold them accountable for their own words. From there, the public can accurately judge these folks on the basis of their own advocacy rather than on the basis of the "I'm just a buttoned up, pragmatic conservative" front that they often put up when appearing on mainstream TV. That is what the project seeks: a more fair discussion.

Let me stress again that no one knows this project and its team better than I do. And let me flatly state that I, the person perhaps most intimately aware of this project, am someone who is 100% willing to go on the air against anyone on GLAAD CAP's list. And in fact, when I recently went on Fox News and was, much to my delight, scheduled to appear opposite Tony Perkins, I was told by two different people involved in the booking of the segment that Tony refused—flatly REFUSED!—to appear on camera opposite me. He insisted, I was told, that we do our segments back-to-back, which I can only assume is so I couldn't speak directly to him (i.e. couldn't directly challenge him).

Yet despite these truths, the anti-LGBT figures will not stop representing GLAAD CAP, its mission, and the varied realities surrounding the project and its messaging. This time it's Michael Brown who insists on wholly and duplicitously misrepresenting the nature of free speech and the threat that holding a public figure accountable for his or her OWN WORDS supposes poses to it. Rock star David Pakman calls him on his B.S.:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails