RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay American Family Association claims the discriminatory business owner is our modern-day Hester Prynne » Focus on the Family fundraising at intersection of self-centeredness and anti-gayness » Count the lies in this Values Voter Summit description » Video: If nothing else will get you to 'Ex-gay Awareness Dinner' then this will—not do the trick either » Video: Bill Donohue on early '90s gay 'animals' and their 'Nazi-like invasions' » Video: Two dads + four kids = one representation of Florida's many denied, discriminated against families » Survey: Catholic leadership's never-ending attacks on gay people's peace is regressing church's acceptance levels » GLAAD: Anti-LGBT activist wishes US punished LGBT people by life imprisonment, just like Uganda and Gambia » Head of Chicago Archdiocese equates LGBT accomodation with forced sharia law » NOM to Oregon: We will not let your dead horses rest; please direct us to your whips and paddles  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/06/2014

Why is FRC finally acknowledging Tony Perkins' ghost writers?

by Jeremy Hooper

For a decade or so, the Family Research Council's daily "Washington Update" has come out under Tony Perkins name, written as if every word came from the president's pen. But now, for the first time in the many years I've been monitoring it, the latest edition now includes this distinction:

Screen Shot 2014-01-06 At 6.05.26 Pm
[Tony Perkins' Washington Update]

My theory: Tony, who rumor has it is gearing up to make a bid for high office, is more bothered by his years of nasty rhetoric than he would ever admit. Some truly awful things have come out via this daily "Update," and I suspect Tony is looking for some wiggle room. This way, he can claim that these words, even if attributed to him, are not really his at all. We've seen that kind of thing before with other org. heads who are asked to own comments that came out under their name.

I mean, with Tony, it would be a very minor step, considering his quote bank of just things delivered with his own voice are bad enough to forever connect him to discrimination's worst angels. But my theory stands. I'm thinking a potential candidate Perkins, who even would-be friends have called out as "extreme," is going to be in desperate search for plausible deniability.

Good luck, if so.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails