RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/06/2014

Why is FRC finally acknowledging Tony Perkins' ghost writers?

by Jeremy Hooper

For a decade or so, the Family Research Council's daily "Washington Update" has come out under Tony Perkins name, written as if every word came from the president's pen. But now, for the first time in the many years I've been monitoring it, the latest edition now includes this distinction:

Screen Shot 2014-01-06 At 6.05.26 Pm
[Tony Perkins' Washington Update]

My theory: Tony, who rumor has it is gearing up to make a bid for high office, is more bothered by his years of nasty rhetoric than he would ever admit. Some truly awful things have come out via this daily "Update," and I suspect Tony is looking for some wiggle room. This way, he can claim that these words, even if attributed to him, are not really his at all. We've seen that kind of thing before with other org. heads who are asked to own comments that came out under their name.

I mean, with Tony, it would be a very minor step, considering his quote bank of just things delivered with his own voice are bad enough to forever connect him to discrimination's worst angels. But my theory stands. I'm thinking a potential candidate Perkins, who even would-be friends have called out as "extreme," is going to be in desperate search for plausible deniability.

Good luck, if so.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails