RECENT  POSTS:  » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house » AL Chief Justice Roy Moore calls marriage equality worse than segregation decision » And by opposition 'from all sides,' FRC means exclusively from the (R) side » Video: What it looked like when that thing happened today » Hillary vows to keep fighting for full LGBT equality; et tu, GOP rivals? » NOM, now truly nuts, encourages Americans to treat marriage equality ruling like Dred Scott  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/20/2014

And another one: Oregon AG won't run cover for history's wrong, unconstitutional side

by Jeremy Hooper

A fifth attorney general is taking a principled stand:

Oregon’s attorney general said she won’t defend her state’s ban on same-sex marriage, joining other top state law enforcement officials in refusing to fight challenges to similar prohibitions.
KEEP READING: Oregon Joins 5 States in Refusing to Defend Gay-Marriage Ban [Bloomberg Businessweek]

State treasurers won't defend the idea that 6 + 4 = 2.

State agricultural commissioners won't brand a carrot as a cob of corn simply because certain special interests wish it were so.

Same thing here. Attorneys general don't have to defend laws that their vast professional training tells them are wrong.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails