RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/17/2014

Focus on the Family calls marriage equality 'nonsensical,' 'destructive forcing of a new definition'

by Jeremy Hooper

Focus on the Family and its action arm (called CitizenLink) are the real victims of discrimination in our nation's marriage debate. Here, let Stuart Shepard explain that one to you:


SOURCE: FOTF Citizenlink

I would have absolutely no problem with any one of Mr. Shepard's statements here, if only he'd begin each one with "In my opinion..." Because that's all this is: his faith-driven opinion about how our civil laws should treat people who are L, G, B, and T (*to be clear, Mr. Shepard supports so-called "ex-gay" therapy designed to "change" us). We are making arguments based in constitutional law, and they are countering with "but we don't like it! [harumph!

I suspect that folks like Shepard will keep sharing these personal opinions long after we win the marriage debate in full. I fully support his right to have his own views; he does not have the right to force those into shared public policy.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails