RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/31/2014

NOM versus tolerance

by Jeremy Hooper

In a 2013 CNN appearance, megapastor Rick Warren—who, I should remind you, has directly compared homosexuality to incest or pedophilia, has likened the gay "struggle" to anger or having multiple sexual partners, and has bizarrely mentioned both arsenic and punching a guy in the nose in the same breath as same-sex marriage—accused LGBT activists of engaging in some sort of Orwellian doublespeak when we talk about tolerance for LGBT. Today, that quip becomes the latest basis for an increasingly desperate special interest group's new meme:

Screen Shot 2014-03-31 At 10.02.03 Am
[NOM]

Right, NOM. Like discriminating against certain kinds of taxpayers because of your personally-held theology, for instance. That's certainly not equally valid to the idea that all religious beliefs, including anti-LGBT ones, can be tolerated and accommodated, so long as they don't encroach into the public sector and stifle other people's civil rights (i.e. the idea that drives the LGBT movement).

The problem, of course, is that groups like NOM and voices like Warren pretend that this notion of equal civil rights is a negotiation in which we just have some sort of disagreement. Um, in a word: no. We are not asking for our rights. We are not requesting their faith-driven permission. We are going to keep pushing until we get exactly what we deserve. And once we achieve that goal, the NOMs and Warrens of the world will be shocked to learn how little we care about their opinions. We will absolutely tolerate their opinions, their expression, and their general engagement because we will have no reason not to. The only reason why we care—THE. ONLY. REASON.—is because they believe they are entitled to religious-guided overreaches. They are just plain wrong—and we don't have to tolerate their bad information.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails