RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/10/2014

Video: Anti-gay ADF creates Arlene's Flowers puff clip; hopes thorn of discrimination will seem like rose

by Jeremy Hooper

Baronelle Stutzman chose to deny a longtime customer of wedding flowers simply because his request was for a same-sex ceremony. That is the fact. It doesn't matter how nice Ms. Stutzman may or may not be; the law is the law.

But since the law is not on the Alliance Defending Freedom's decidedly anti-LGBT side, they are instead hoping a smoothly filmed and edited puff video might help their case. Take a look:

Every time someone on that side talks about these situations involving flowers or cakes or what-have-yas, they focus on how "lovingly" the business owner supposedly denied the customer or how willingly they would have honored another kind of request. I don't at all deny that this is, in fact, true, either factually or to the minds of some of the deniers. A lot of people who oppose LGBT rights are actually quite genial in how they do it. This is not news to most LGBT people; most us have experienced condemnations-thru-smiles.

It changes nothing. This is not a congeniality pageant—it's the law. It's about the slippery slope of discrimination and the far-right's attempt to abuse "religious freedom" in order to advance their anti-LGBT agenda. Period. Whether done with a smile or done with an angry fist, it's still discrimination.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails