RECENT  POSTS:  » That Idaho wedding venue posts new 'rules and regulations'; will still perform non-Christian weddings » Another deceptive thing about NOM's duplicitous anti-Hagan ad » NOM trying to shape Arkansas politics without even learning state's abbreviation » Video: Focus on the Family staffer who calls homosexuality 'particularly evil lie of Satan' hangs out in Chicago's Boystown » Video: Another new NOM ad targets Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR); uses James O'Keefe video as source » What the heck is 'NOM Victory Fund'? » Video: NOM reminds North Carolinians that they, Thom Tillis forced state into unconstitutional mess » Actually no, kindness does not demand making people mad at you » Another evangelical leader comes out against so-called reparative therapy » And the intended spouses who are refused service are what, exactly? Trees? Aliens?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/02/2014

Anti-gay activist forgets his movement's steady stream of boycotts; clearly he needs a Starbucks pick-me-up

by Jeremy Hooper

In an attempt to make pro-equality people look bad for expressing hesitancy toward the Firefox browser, since it has come out that the parent company's CEO donated to the deeply discriminatory Proposition 8 campaign, California activist Randy Thomasson lays the following trap:

In addition to intolerance, Thomasson sees a double standard at play. "Look at the head of Starbucks. Starbucks is very much taking people's dollars for coffee and handing it to homosexual activists and their political campaigns," he says.

"But here, you donate to marriage between a man and a woman, [you] say marriage licenses are naturally only for a husband and a wife, and then the homosexual activists say, Off with your head! I mean, it really is showing intolerance."
[ONN]

Except, of course (and I suspect your ahead of me on this one), the National Organization For Marriage has led a 2+ year boycott against Starbucks precisely because of the company's support for equality. Tea Party groups, other anti-LGBT organizations, and a whole slew of prominent conservatives joined this call. And unlike anything going on with Firefox/Mozilla, where pushback has been loose, differentiated, and varied, this "Dump Starbucks" campaign was a legit call to boycott, brought forth by a national group for the sole purpose of harming the company—all because they supported certain kinds of customers (rather than opposed them, like Mozilla's CEO).

So nice try with that whole "double standard," talk Randy. But no. When it comes to both merit and rage, your boycott-loving, pro-discrimination movement is in another league.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails