RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/02/2014

Anti-gay activist forgets his movement's steady stream of boycotts; clearly he needs a Starbucks pick-me-up

by Jeremy Hooper

In an attempt to make pro-equality people look bad for expressing hesitancy toward the Firefox browser, since it has come out that the parent company's CEO donated to the deeply discriminatory Proposition 8 campaign, California activist Randy Thomasson lays the following trap:

In addition to intolerance, Thomasson sees a double standard at play. "Look at the head of Starbucks. Starbucks is very much taking people's dollars for coffee and handing it to homosexual activists and their political campaigns," he says.

"But here, you donate to marriage between a man and a woman, [you] say marriage licenses are naturally only for a husband and a wife, and then the homosexual activists say, Off with your head! I mean, it really is showing intolerance."
[ONN]

Except, of course (and I suspect your ahead of me on this one), the National Organization For Marriage has led a 2+ year boycott against Starbucks precisely because of the company's support for equality. Tea Party groups, other anti-LGBT organizations, and a whole slew of prominent conservatives joined this call. And unlike anything going on with Firefox/Mozilla, where pushback has been loose, differentiated, and varied, this "Dump Starbucks" campaign was a legit call to boycott, brought forth by a national group for the sole purpose of harming the company—all because they supported certain kinds of customers (rather than opposed them, like Mozilla's CEO).

So nice try with that whole "double standard," talk Randy. But no. When it comes to both merit and rage, your boycott-loving, pro-discrimination movement is in another league.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails